Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-05-2007, 09:31 PM
mpleleaf mpleleaf is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: New brunswick , Canada
Posts: 9
mpleleaf is on a distinguished road
Default Tunze Protein Skimmers

I'm doing research for the purchase of a new skimmer ($500-800 approx.)and came across the Tunze line of skimmers. I never heard of them having skimmers before and was wondering if anybody could give a review of them or any valuable info, good or bad! Also, this will be going on a system between 200-250 gal. located in a family room. Sump will be located under cabinet, so chime in with your thoughts on a quiet skimmer going roughly on this info!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-06-2007, 04:56 AM
danny zubot's Avatar
danny zubot danny zubot is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Castlegar BC
Posts: 3,469
danny zubot is on a distinguished road
Default reply

Quiet skimmer? Whats that?

I have no experience with Tunze skimmers but ASM are easy to use, clean, tweek etc. Reasonalbly priced too IMO.
__________________
THE BARQUARIUM:
55 gallon cube - 50 lbs LR - ASM G3 skimmer - 30 Gallon sump - 22 Gallon refugium / frag tank - 4x 24 watt HO T5's - Mag 9.5 return - Pin Point PH monitor - 400 watt XM 20K MH in Lumenarc reflector - Dual stage GFO/NO3 media reactor - 6 stage RODI auto top up -Wavemaster Pro running 3 Koralia 2's.

Fully stocked with fish, corals and usually some fine scotch
http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=55041
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-06-2007, 05:58 AM
Slick Fork's Avatar
Slick Fork Slick Fork is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 631
Slick Fork is on a distinguished road
Default

I have the Tunze 9010 on my system (100 gallon display, 40ish gallon sump). I absolutely love it, very quiet and easy to use and pulls a good amount of skimmate as well. You can use it in-tank or in the sump. Very energy efficient and a small footprint as well.

I believe "Doug" did a formal review of his 9010. There's also a ton of info on them at Reef Central.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-06-2007, 06:13 AM
fkshiu's Avatar
fkshiu fkshiu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,499
fkshiu is on a distinguished road
Default

I've got one of the older Tunze skimmer models (240/1) on my 165 gallon system. It's essentially a bigger version of the current 9210 model.

http://www.jlaquatics.com/phpstore/s...t_ID=tz-ps9210

It is quiet for a skimmer. Quieter than my old Euroreef CS6-2 with a Sedra meshmodded needlewheel and skims as well as the ER.

Tunze takes an entirely different approach to skimmers than what most people are used to seeing - small and efficient. The Tunze probably takes up less than half the room of the ER and uses less electricity. It's probably not the skimmer for someone who wants to skim the beejesus out of their system, but it is a quiet and efficient little skimmer that gets the job done.

Tunze has a newer line of skimmers (9010, 9015, 9020) as well.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-06-2007, 06:34 AM
Borderjumper Borderjumper is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,747
Borderjumper is on a distinguished road
Default

Ive got a Tunze 9010 and it works just fine. Its a nice compact skimmer and I bought it for the lower profile as my sump area is somewhat restricted in height. It doesnt pull the skanky skimmate that my Deltec does, but it does its job and is fairly quiet. I'm quite happy with it.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-06-2007, 08:30 AM
andresont's Avatar
andresont andresont is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Port Moody, BC.
Posts: 594
andresont is on a distinguished road
Default

I used to have tunze230/3 on my older 108 Gal.
it was very quiet, easy to clean, and had an ozone port.
These are DOC skimmers (disolved organic carbon skimmers) and will NOT skimm particulate and plancton.
I can compare it to my ETSS (check my pictures for the feast full of a skimmate on this monster). and you know what,? my tank was not better with ETSS. That is why when i had a chance a bought tunze 240/3 but never got to use it because i have no sump on my new tank.
So i vote for Tunze big time.
I know skimmers are very touchy subject and everyone has favorits, but for me its alwaysthe same points to consider when selecting a skimmer
1 Ammount of air mixing.
2 Quietness.
3 easyness of cleanning.
4 Power consumption.
the rest is marketing hipe like for example galon rating... gallons do not produce waiste right? animals do.
HTH


~~~
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-06-2007, 02:33 PM
Doug's Avatar
Doug Doug is offline
Rest In Peace
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kamloops BC
Posts: 4,920
Doug has disabled reputation
Default

http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=30063

I,m happy with mine. As I run sumpless, it was my best choice, IMO. I dont know if its enough for a larger 200g plus tank though. Tunze does have a new line out of larger skimmers.
__________________
Doug

Last edited by Delphinus; 10-07-2007 at 07:12 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-06-2007, 03:22 PM
Aquattro's Avatar
Aquattro Aquattro is offline
Just a guy..
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 18,053
Aquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andresont View Post
Igallons do not produce waiste right? animals do.
Well, while this is partially true, the goal is to remove the waste from the amount of water you have in a timely fashion. So 10 fish in a 20 gallon and 10 fish in a 200 gallon is not the same thing. You need a skimmer that can process the water you have to remove nutrients quickly, there for a bigger skimmer (porcessing rate) is required for a bigger tank.
__________________
Brad
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-06-2007, 05:19 PM
mpleleaf mpleleaf is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: New brunswick , Canada
Posts: 9
mpleleaf is on a distinguished road
Default

So, for a best estimate , how long has Tunze been making their skimmer. I only just heard of them and I'm wondering in the big skeem of things why they are never mentioned. I know of the quality set in the powerheads and hopefully it spills over! I'm planning in the future for a 180G with my 77G as my sump. So, I guess the system will run at the 220G capacity mark( this will in fact be alot less with the rock and substate added, not sure how much), does anybody have an opinion wheather Tunze could handle it and if maybe I should go for a lot bigger unit for the amt. of gal.? Does anyone get the dark and stinky skimate from their unit?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-06-2007, 08:37 PM
Slick Fork's Avatar
Slick Fork Slick Fork is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 631
Slick Fork is on a distinguished road
Default

If you check out the Tunze website, they have a guide describing how to size their skimmers. It talks about rated gallons and how to adjust that rating if you want to keep softies, lps, or sps corals.

Mine has been running problem free for just under a year, I have mine dialed in so I get some really dark stinky stuff coming out.

Last edited by Slick Fork; 10-06-2007 at 08:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.