![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I consider my bioload medium and the skimmer I have is "realistically rated (TM)" for 250gal or 180gal heavy bioload. It seems to do ok and I've never not had algae (except for that one time) so it does as well as I expect it to.
I generally gauge my bioload on fish type and size. Tangs eat a lot and crap a lot and I have a "enough" of them so I'd consider myself medium bioload leaning towards heavy-ish. Interesting question. I also am interested in how people relate their bioload to skimmer size and "over skimming". Is this even possible?
__________________
Christy's Reef Blog My 180 Build Every electronic component is shipped with smoke stored deep inside.... only a real genius can find a way to set it free. |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() My theory (as if anyone cares):
Testing of bio-load has to be through titration but instead of adding drops of some chemical, you have to keep on adding fishes till you see (whichever comes first): 1. Sudden growth of algae 2. Sudden deterioration of water quality 3. Do water change more than you would like to When any of the three results matches, you have a heavy bio-load. Small bioload is the point where you don't see any fish in the tank (or you are an irrational environmental activist) and medium would be anything between small+1 and heavy-1.
__________________
You wouldn't want to see my tank. I don't use fancy equipment and I am a noob ![]() |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I don't think you will see a sudden anything. I think of it as more gradual thing. It is a biological system, and, depending on your rock, sand, reactors, etc you may or may not be able to process a certain amount of fish waste. The bacteria will adapt and multiply to the point where they encounter a limitation of some sort (usually carbon). If you supply that, they will continue to grow to match the bio-load.
I also think of corals as consumers of nutrients, rather than adding to the bio-load. Am I wrong? |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() While they use nutrients they do not really remove them from a system just process them and get rid of what's not used, this may be food for other life including other coral . Certain things can not get processed out and eventually need some sort of export out of the system.
As for the size thing , its not always the biggest animals with largest bioload , snails , urchins and sea hares tend to do a lot of pooping lol I would bet a sea hares waste is ten times as much as fish three times it's size.
__________________
........ |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() So then, how do I estimate my bioload? Good question, huh??
![]()
__________________
Brad |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I always just get a skimmer twice rated my volume size , seems to work well lol
__________________
........ |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() i have always gauged my bio load on type of fish and how many I have and size and feeding .I have a 90 gal tank and I think I am pushing the heavy side of bioload I don't think theres away to measure other then maybe skimate from your skimmer .I like the idea of a skimmer twice the size or close to more then half of water volume . just my two cents worth
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Brad |
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() |
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Brad |