|
|
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: What is your PO4 testing routine, and what do you do to control PO4? | |||
| I run GFO. |
   
|
26 | 46.43% |
| I run a ULNS system. (Eg. Zeovit, Ultralith, Vodka or other carbon dosing) |
  
|
13 | 23.21% |
| I use macroalgae (chaeto, caulerpa, etc.) |
  
|
31 | 55.36% |
| I don't do anything. Water changes good enough for me! |
  
|
8 | 14.29% |
| I test PO4 regularly. |
  
|
8 | 14.29% |
| I test PO4 infrequently. |
  
|
15 | 26.79% |
| I have noticed nonzero PO4 in the past. |
|
3 | 5.36% |
| I have never had a PO4 reading. |
|
8 | 14.29% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 56. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#27
11-06-2009, 02:19 AM
|
|||||
|
|||||
Hey Tony, I added some more thoughts to my post before I saw your reply. I'm bad for editing, and re-editing, and editing some more adding more thoughts.
 Imo, the difference between "undetectable" and "not present at this level" is that "undetectable" admits the test kits' accuracy may be (probably is) lacking where "not present at this level" suggests a positivity that we really can't confirm. 
|
Threaded Mode
