|
|
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: If skimmers didn't exist, which would be your next choice? | |||
| Wet/Dry (trickle) filter |
   
|
12 | 8.51% |
| Fluidized bed filter |
  
|
5 | 3.55% |
| UV sterilizer |
  
|
9 | 6.38% |
| Mechanical filter |
  
|
10 | 7.09% |
| Live rock/sand bed (exclusively) |
  
|
75 | 53.19% |
| Carbon filter |
  
|
14 | 9.93% |
| Other |
|
16 | 11.35% |
| Voters: 141. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#30
03-20-2006, 04:53 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
Rory,
Thanks for the compliments  Low bioload is only one reason I keep fewer fish than most people. The other, and probably more important reason, is to not be a heavy consumer of wild fish populations. I've talked at length about this consumer issue on other recent threads, one of which is the LFS debate. 
|
Threaded Mode
