![]() |
|
View Poll Results: If skimmers didn't exist, which would be your next choice? | |||
Wet/Dry (trickle) filter |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
12 | 8.51% |
Fluidized bed filter |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 3.55% |
UV sterilizer |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 6.38% |
Mechanical filter |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 7.09% |
Live rock/sand bed (exclusively) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
75 | 53.19% |
Carbon filter |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
14 | 9.93% |
Other |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
16 | 11.35% |
Voters: 141. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() i just used carbon and that's it......now it got a skimmer a year ago and i notice alot less algea.I had a eclipse canopy with 2 n/o 15 watt and "3 stage" filter on the 20, I have had my 20 gal since i was 12..... now 20. i never knew about all this info. on the net it really helps out lots!!!!!!
|