Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-01-2013, 12:36 AM
HaZRaTTy's Avatar
HaZRaTTy HaZRaTTy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 482
HaZRaTTy is on a distinguished road
Default Hanna Testers Pros/Cons?

Hey

I'm on the fence of buying a Hanna Phosphate Device, I see that they also make a Ph,Alk,Calc.

Does any one use them or own them what do like about them? I mean I can see the Pros of having these units but wondering what the cons are?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-01-2013, 12:44 AM
spit.fire's Avatar
spit.fire spit.fire is offline
Second Best
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Abbotsford
Posts: 1,571
spit.fire is on a distinguished road
Default

Phosphate tester is good, calcium one sucks
__________________
Guide to building super awesome rock structures / my tank journal
http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/sho...d.php?t=116410
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-01-2013, 12:50 AM
Phil Phil is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Spruce grove
Posts: 328
Phil is on a distinguished road
Default

Had them and sold them stick to regular test kits in my opinion
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-01-2013, 12:50 AM
gregzz4's Avatar
gregzz4 gregzz4 is offline
On Hiatus
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Burnaby, B.C.
Posts: 4,890
gregzz4 will become famous soon enough
Default

I have the PO4 tester
I've only used it twice so far, but what I don't like about it is;

Error margin of +/- 0.04
First test came out @ 0.04, and the second one @ 0.08, so what is my true reading ?

Having to polish the cuvettes and handle them by only the lid or threads is a pain, but I guess it's the price we pay to use it

The time limit between the reference sample and the test sample is barely long enough to add the powder, mix it and then insert it for the test

I tried using one cuvette for the reference test and the second one for the actual test. This gave me more prep time to mix the powder, but leaves a margin of error as I didn't use 1 cuvette for the reference and the test
I then prepped a powder packet, did a reference with 1 cuvette, mixed the powder in the same cuvette and barely had enough time to get it into the tester before the 3min limit ran out
This second test was twice as high as the first one ...

Difference between the 2 cuvettes could be the culprit, or the margin of error

I still prefer the accuracy of this over my Seachem kit as that thing never shows any PO4 when I use it, unless I use the reference fluid
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-01-2013, 01:10 AM
subman's Avatar
subman subman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,509
subman is on a distinguished road
Default

I had the Ca and Alk ones and sold them to go to the red sea reef foundations pro kit. I just found the Hannah's where inaccurate, due to as what Greg said having to keep the vials perfectly clean.
__________________
225gal dt with 100g sump. Mitras, vortechs, bubble king, AI Sol and Profilux.
http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/sho...threadid=84782
Will trade subs for frags

My other summer hobby:
http://www.edkra.ca
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-01-2013, 01:20 AM
toxic111 toxic111 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lloydminster, SK
Posts: 237
toxic111 is on a distinguished road
Default

I found both the PO4 & the ALK tests to be great. I haven't tried the Ca one though.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.