Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-01-2010, 10:46 PM
Milad's Avatar
Milad Milad is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 901
Milad is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to Milad
Default how many times a hour should the water go through the sump?

just wondering how many times an hour should the tank water go through the sump? 1? 5? 10?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-01-2010, 11:17 PM
xtreme xtreme is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 772
xtreme is on a distinguished road
Default

I would aim for about 3-5x per hour.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-01-2010, 11:17 PM
golf nut golf nut is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: just north of Toronto
Posts: 454
golf nut is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Milad View Post
just wondering how many times an hour should the tank water go through the sump? 1? 5? 10?
If you have selected the correct skimmer and the flow in the tank is moving the water towards the overflow box then.. 2 or 2 1/2 times max.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-01-2010, 11:30 PM
Zoaelite's Avatar
Zoaelite Zoaelite is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,461
Zoaelite is on a distinguished road
Default

There is really no set amount, slow or fast both work the same. Mine is set at about 800GPH swap over or almost 5 complete tank volumes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr OM View Post
If you have selected the correct skimmer and the flow in the tank is moving the water towards the overflow box then.. 2 or 2 1/2 times max.
Why a max of 2?

Last edited by Zoaelite; 04-01-2010 at 11:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-01-2010, 11:36 PM
golf nut golf nut is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: just north of Toronto
Posts: 454
golf nut is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zoaElite View Post
There is really no set amount, slow or fast both work the same. Mine is set at about 800GPH swap over or almost 5 complete tank volumes..
Levi

Actually skimmers work best at a 1 times turnover, that's how they are designed, beyond that they become less efficient.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-01-2010, 11:45 PM
Zoaelite's Avatar
Zoaelite Zoaelite is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,461
Zoaelite is on a distinguished road
Default

I was waiting for someone to make this argument, please explain to me why that would be?

If a skimmer draws in water @ a set rate which is completely unrelated to the water movement around it then why would slowing that water down increase its efficiency?
Levi
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-01-2010, 11:50 PM
golf nut golf nut is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: just north of Toronto
Posts: 454
golf nut is on a distinguished road
Default

It's quite simple, if you run a lower turnover rate the water(containing surfactants) coming from the overflow box is concentrated rather than being 10% crap and 90% water in a 10x rate, the skimmer does a far more effective job with a concentrated solution than a diluted one.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-02-2010, 12:12 AM
freezetyle's Avatar
freezetyle freezetyle is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Victoria
Posts: 802
freezetyle is on a distinguished road
Default

By that logic, the same amount of water would pass through the skimmer would it not?

Theoretically:
1gph=100% skimmed
10gph= 10%/gal

I dont really have a preference. As long as water gets skimmed its a win situation.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-02-2010, 12:19 AM
golf nut golf nut is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: just north of Toronto
Posts: 454
golf nut is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freezetyle View Post
By that logic, the same amount of water would pass through the skimmer would it not?

Theoretically:
1gph=100% skimmed
10gph= 10%/gal

I dont really have a preference. As long as water gets skimmed its a win situation.
If you skim it 100% then what you return to the tank is clean, if you skim 10% of it then 90% of what you return is dirty or unskimmed, why would you do that when it costs more money in hydro and pumps to do worse?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-02-2010, 12:56 AM
freezetyle's Avatar
freezetyle freezetyle is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Victoria
Posts: 802
freezetyle is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr OM View Post
If you skim it 100% then what you return to the tank is clean, if you skim 10% of it then 90% of what you return is dirty or unskimmed, why would you do that when it costs more money in hydro and pumps to do worse?
I understand that. But say, someone was using there return pump for extra flow to their tank. The extra water movement through there wouldn't technically affect the skim-mate that is pulled out of the water.

That being said, there is no actual way to test out these theories as a skimmer pulls out skim-mate in both situations. This test would be almost impossible because everyones tank (or say a "test tank") would differ from one another so getting a control would be practically impossible. I am not saying your opinion is wrong/invalid , I am just saying that in my opinion the flow rate through your sump isn't a big thing to lose sleep on.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.