Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Product Review and Equipment Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-29-2009, 11:08 PM
Palmer's Avatar
Palmer Palmer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary SW
Posts: 362
Palmer is on a distinguished road
Default Skimmer size

I'm looking at setting up a 60 Gallon cube system with a 20 G sump. I wanted to use a Tunze skimmer but I wasnt sure whether I should get the nano 9002 or the Doc 9005. I think the nano is specified for 55 G and the 9005 is for 55-528 G. Since I will have live rock in the tank (approx. 60 lbs) and the sump will not be completely full I wasn't sure if the Nano would be okay?

thoughts?

thanks!

Palmer
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-29-2009, 11:15 PM
xtreme xtreme is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 772
xtreme is on a distinguished road
Default

I think the 52-528g is referring to Tunze's whole line of skimmers. Looks like the 9005 is rated for up to 100g. I don't have any experience with Tunze skimmers but generally speaking bigger is better.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-29-2009, 11:24 PM
Palmer's Avatar
Palmer Palmer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary SW
Posts: 362
Palmer is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xtreme View Post
I think the 52-528g is referring to Tunze's whole line of skimmers. Looks like the 9005 is rated for up to 100g. I don't have any experience with Tunze skimmers but generally speaking bigger is better.
Thanks for pointing that out I didn't catch that it was on the specs for the 9005 but it makes sense that one skimmer wouldn't have that wide of an application.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-29-2009, 11:59 PM
Richer's Avatar
Richer Richer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Edmonton (Southwest), AB
Posts: 784
Richer is on a distinguished road
Default

+1 bigger is better

The 9002 is kind of small... I don't think it'll be a good long term choice for your tank. I bought one for my 15 gallon + 10 gallon sump. Right now I'd hesitate to put it on a larger system... but to be honest, the system isn't up and running yet, so I might eat my words







That's a 1" bulkhead for size reference.

How about a 9010? There's one FS right now...

http://canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=56383
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-30-2009, 12:07 AM
fencer's Avatar
fencer fencer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ed Ab
Posts: 1,331
fencer is on a distinguished road
Default

A good guideline is get one that is rated to 2x the total gallons of your system
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-30-2009, 01:04 AM
Myka's Avatar
Myka Myka is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Saskatoon, SK.
Posts: 11,268
Myka will become famous soon enough
Default

Yes, remember that what a skimmer is rated for is the MAX. A lot of people get a 180 gallon tank, and think a skimmer that is good for 180 gallons is a perfect choice. That doesn't make any sense at all. I like to stay about 30% from the rating. So for your tank which total volume will probably be about 70 gallons (assuming the sump half full), you would do well with a skimmr rated for 100 or so gallons. I think you may be happier with an EuroReef RS-100 or a Vertex IN-100 instead of the Tunze 9005 though. I'm not a fan of the Tunze skimmers (other than the Nano does a good job on small tanks).
__________________
~ Mindy

SPS fanatic.


Last edited by Myka; 09-30-2009 at 01:07 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-30-2009, 02:25 AM
Palmer's Avatar
Palmer Palmer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary SW
Posts: 362
Palmer is on a distinguished road
Default

Thanks for the info everyone. I guess going for the a larger skimmer is the best way to go.

Myka- thanks for the recommendations, I will have to check the other two out. Is there something specific you do not like about the Tunze? Is it that it does not produce as much "skimate" (I believe that is a word!) as compared to the other brands?

Palmer
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-30-2009, 04:28 AM
fencer's Avatar
fencer fencer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ed Ab
Posts: 1,331
fencer is on a distinguished road
Default

Now is it going to be needlewheel or beckett ?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-30-2009, 04:45 AM
shrimpchips's Avatar
shrimpchips shrimpchips is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ontario
Posts: 440
shrimpchips is on a distinguished road
Default

The nano skimmer barely handles my ~28g system - you'll definitely want a bigger skimmer.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-30-2009, 05:11 AM
globaldesigns's Avatar
globaldesigns globaldesigns is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,863
globaldesigns is on a distinguished road
Default

If interested, I have a Tunze 9010 for sell, it only has 4 months on it.

If interested, PM me an offer... It is mint shape
__________________



Setup: 180G DT, 105G Refuge (approx. 300lbs LR, 150lbs Aragonite)
Hardware: Super Reef Octopus SSS-3000, Tunze ATO, Mag 18 return, 2x MP40W, 2X Koralia 4's Wavemaker
Lighting: 5ft Hamilton Belize Sun (2x250W MH, 2X80W T5HO)
Type of Aquarium: mixed reef (SPS & LPS) with fish
Dosing: Mg, Ca, Alk
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.