Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Nano Tank Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-28-2009, 06:21 AM
t_hac's Avatar
t_hac t_hac is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: White rock, BC
Posts: 9
t_hac is on a distinguished road
Default bare bottom?

hey everyone!

i most likely going to buy a aquapod 12 or biocube 8, reason being the watts per gallon is 4.5 where as the biocube 14 is only 3.4

anyways i contemplating wether or not to do a bare bottom tank.?

or the regular sand bed 2-3inch

i am going to have it a coral only tank with no fish only some inverts...

whats your opinion on bare bottoms? (hehe no pun intended )
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-28-2009, 06:23 AM
Rbacchiega's Avatar
Rbacchiega Rbacchiega is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: I'm A Gypsy
Posts: 1,238
Rbacchiega is on a distinguished road
Default

I've always liked the look of sand in a tank...
__________________
75 gallon with 20 gallon sump in the works.
R. Bacchiega. Tattooer
I didn't smack you, I simply High Fived your face.
I've got so much glue on my pants it looks like a Friday night gone horribly wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-28-2009, 06:30 AM
t_hac's Avatar
t_hac t_hac is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: White rock, BC
Posts: 9
t_hac is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rbacchiega View Post
I've always liked the look of sand in a tank...
yea i like the look too but this one is all about the corals and im wondering if its a big + to have BB,

but i also dont like the look when theres a bunch of algae growing out of it and its all dirty
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-28-2009, 06:59 AM
Rbacchiega's Avatar
Rbacchiega Rbacchiega is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: I'm A Gypsy
Posts: 1,238
Rbacchiega is on a distinguished road
Default

you could always get a conch...barebottoms to me, although they have their advantages...don't seem to turn my crank (bahahahahaha).

Plus, if you're only going corals, I don't imagine there'd be a whole helluva lot of detrius on the bottom so long as you're doing regular maintenance...could be wrong, but that's my opinion
__________________
75 gallon with 20 gallon sump in the works.
R. Bacchiega. Tattooer
I didn't smack you, I simply High Fived your face.
I've got so much glue on my pants it looks like a Friday night gone horribly wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-28-2009, 12:52 PM
mark's Avatar
mark mark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Edmonton AB
Posts: 4,212
mark is on a distinguished road
Default

Be surprised how many people will be looking at my tank then after 10-15 minutes go, 'I just noticed, you've got no sand'.

If you do go sand, just go a enough to cover the bottom, a 1" or less.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-28-2009, 12:58 PM
Snaz's Avatar
Snaz Snaz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 1,034
Snaz is on a distinguished road
Default

I have 1 - 1.5 inches of sand in my AP12 and I don't have any algae on the surface. I'm not sure which critters are keeping it clean but I suspect the 12 small hermits are shifting it enough. The only algae the tank has ever had is the 2 day old brown haze on the glass which the magfloat cleans in a jiffy. Oh and LOTS of coraline!

I slope my sand high in the back, shallow to front so the sand at the front is level with the black trim.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-28-2009, 02:58 PM
mike31154's Avatar
mike31154 mike31154 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vernon
Posts: 2,073
mike31154 will become famous soon enough
Default

No comment on the BB, but you mention a difference in watts per gallon that you are basing your purchase decision on. What type of lighting are we talking about here for either the aquapod or biocube? If you're going to keep corals you may be well advised to concentrate more on the type of light output rather than watts per gallon. The difference in light output for given watt of the different options (MH, T5HO, PC) is substantial. Watts per gallon alone is no longer a good indicator of what's best for your livestock.
__________________
Mike
77g sumpless SW
DIY 10 watt multi-chip LED build http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=82206
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-28-2009, 07:53 PM
Whatigot Whatigot is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Coquitlam, B.C.
Posts: 680
Whatigot is on a distinguished road
Default

IMO, the only thing bare bottoms are good for is spanking

I ran a heavily stocked aquapod with no skim for a year and I contribute my success to the 5' of crushed coral I had on the bottom.
Pod city and excellent bio filtration...
In a larger tank, I don't think it makes as big of a difference, but in a smaller one, makes a big dif.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-28-2009, 09:30 PM
t_hac's Avatar
t_hac t_hac is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: White rock, BC
Posts: 9
t_hac is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mike31154 View Post
No comment on the BB, but you mention a difference in watts per gallon that you are basing your purchase decision on. What type of lighting are we talking about here for either the aquapod or biocube? If you're going to keep corals you may be well advised to concentrate more on the type of light output rather than watts per gallon. The difference in light output for given watt of the different options (MH, T5HO, PC) is substantial. Watts per gallon alone is no longer a good indicator of what's best for your livestock.
yea i know, for now all i can afford is the stock lighting so i am looking at the most wattage i can get... and if the bulbs arent cutting it ill replace them.

the aquapod has the sunpaq pcs which apparently produce %50 more lumen output than comparable bulbs...

so thats what im leaning for.. the most power for stock lights, i know t5/mh is better i had a t5 fixture on my 55 and saw the difference from my pc light on the type and output that they give off...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-28-2009, 09:31 PM
t_hac's Avatar
t_hac t_hac is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: White rock, BC
Posts: 9
t_hac is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whatigot View Post
IMO, the only thing bare bottoms are good for is spanking

I ran a heavily stocked aquapod with no skim for a year and I contribute my success to the 5' of crushed coral I had on the bottom.
Pod city and excellent bio filtration...
In a larger tank, I don't think it makes as big of a difference, but in a smaller one, makes a big dif.
yea i am now leaning to having a small amount of substrate to keep the pods happy and i forgot about the bio filtration, since i have no skimmer this will be a +
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.