Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > Buy/Sell/Trade > Buy/Sell/Trade (Aquatics hardware related only)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-03-2008, 05:20 AM
Rippin Rippin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 209
Rippin is on a distinguished road
Default FS: Canon S45 Digital Camera and Underwater Case

Everything is sold.

Last edited by Rippin; 02-07-2008 at 03:22 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-03-2008, 06:30 AM
sexyshrimp sexyshrimp is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5
sexyshrimp is on a distinguished road
Default

Oh my goodness. I already have a camera but HOW ON EARTH do you get such stunning pictures out of a 4.0megapixel camera?!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-03-2008, 07:08 AM
andresont's Avatar
andresont andresont is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Port Moody, BC.
Posts: 594
andresont is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sexyshrimp View Post
Oh my goodness. I already have a camera but HOW ON EARTH do you get such stunning pictures out of a 4.0megapixel camera?!

Mega pixels have nothing to do with picture quality IMO,
You only need more MP if you are planning to print huge prints.
Anything more then 10MP on 3x6 print will result in lesser quality because of too many pixels being crammed it to small area.
Basically if you are printing small prints 3MP is more then enough and picture quality is solemnly depends on the lens quality, that’s what reflected light travels through.
I have some stunning macro pics of a lady bug made with 3.2 MP camera.
More MP is just a hype to sell more new cameras with questionable lens quality to make more money not better pictures.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-03-2008, 08:23 AM
Rippin Rippin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 209
Rippin is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andresont View Post
Mega pixels have nothing to do with picture quality IMO,
You only need more MP if you are planning to print huge prints.
Anything more then 10MP on 3x6 print will result in lesser quality because of too many pixels being crammed it to small area.
Basically if you are printing small prints 3MP is more then enough and picture quality is solemnly depends on the lens quality, that’s what reflected light travels through.
I have some stunning macro pics of a lady bug made with 3.2 MP camera.
More MP is just a hype to sell more new cameras with questionable lens quality to make more money not better pictures.
Agreed
I can't really say that the replacement that I got for the S45 "takes a better picture", although the megapixel count is much higher. There's a reason why the S45/S50 and the G3/G5 series are highly regarded - because they take great pictures. I just wanted something more compact for day to day photos (got a Sony), so no need for the S45 anymore.

Even the Rebel XT that I have doesn't take outstanding pictures as one would expect. I purchased the Rebel XT as a kit which included a lens, but imo, not a good one. A better lens would make that XT shine (still researching the replacement lens).
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-03-2008, 08:39 AM
spoot spoot is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 252
spoot is on a distinguished road
Default

I have a S45, it's a nice camera. How much was the case retail rippin?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-03-2008, 07:19 PM
j3d j3d is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 1
j3d is on a distinguished road
Default

I agree, as long as you dont need to print your picture bigger than a 3x6 then your fine with a 3-4mp camera. I have the same underwater case that I use when snorkelling, works pretty good but gave my s30 away that's why it's lying here somewhere.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-05-2008, 10:27 PM
Marlin65's Avatar
Marlin65 Marlin65 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New Westminster
Posts: 1,024
Marlin65 is on a distinguished road
Default

Not bad pictures considering there is no external strobe on that camera.
Get a EFS 17-55 for your Rebel Xt you will be happy with that lens.
I just bought the body for my 30D the kit lenses are no good.
The glass is more important than the pixels, and having a good eye helps.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-06-2008, 01:17 AM
Rippin Rippin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 209
Rippin is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlin65 View Post
Not bad pictures considering there is no external strobe on that camera.
Get a EFS 17-55 for your Rebel Xt you will be happy with that lens.
I just bought the body for my 30D the kit lenses are no good.
The glass is more important than the pixels, and having a good eye helps.

That's a little bit more than what I was planning on spending for a lens

I was looking at this one: http://www.henrys.com/webapp/wcs/sto...&itemID=134206
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.