|
|
|
#21
06-13-2007, 07:54 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
Hey Chin - not worried about the substrate leaching phosphate? I'd be interested to see what kind of PO4 the reactor is emitting.
Having said that, I haven't tested my reactor output though because ignorance is bliss!!
__________________
-- Tony My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee! 
|
|
#22
06-14-2007, 01:49 AM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
difference
Quote:
But otherwise, I can't personally see the difference between crushed coral brand A and crushed coral brand B or crushed coral brand C. I am actually in the planning phase of making a closed loop phoshate remover out of a Phosban reactor for the efluent of a calcium reactor.
__________________
____________ If people don't die, it wouldn't make living important. And why do we fall? So we can learn to pick ourselves up.
|
|
#23
06-14-2007, 03:12 AM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
No but I thought we're using reactor media over just any old coral gravel because that "reactor media" is intended to have fewer phosphates. I dunno if that's just a marketing gimmick though. But that's why I thought you shouldn't throw things like snail shells in your reactor media and so on.
Maybe that's a valid test for comparing various reactor media brands - see what kind of PO4 they emit. Doesn't Marc basically have a recirc stage for the effluent going through some phosban? Sounds like a decent idea to me anyhow.
__________________
-- Tony My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee!
|
Linear Mode
