Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 06-16-2006, 12:12 AM
TheReefGeek's Avatar
TheReefGeek TheReefGeek is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 1,503
TheReefGeek is on a distinguished road
Default

Will the wavebox be very effective in the corner behind the rocks?
__________________
Rory

Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-16-2006, 02:30 AM
andrewsk's Avatar
andrewsk andrewsk is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 285
andrewsk is on a distinguished road
Default

From what I have read, the Wavebox will work fine from the corner even if there a rocks near it. I guess it has more to do with the sonic resonance of the tank than actually pushing water. As long as it is pointing down the length of the tank, it should work fine.

I was reading about an experiment where the wave box can actually run from outside of the tank in a small glass box attached to the side of the tank with only one small hole. Ill try to find the link. It is pretty neat.

We will see though. Ill report my findings here and let you know. Worst case is I have to move the rock out an inch or two.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-16-2006, 02:42 AM
Denis's Avatar
Denis Denis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Abbotsford,BC
Posts: 129
Denis is on a distinguished road
Default

My wavebox is also behind rocks with only 12" of space on front of it. I get 1" wave.
__________________
Denis

150g SPS reef;3x250WHQI,Tunze Streams,Wavebox,Neptune Apex,fishroom in basement ,reefing since 93,SPS since 99.
TOTM June 2010
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-16-2006, 03:37 AM
Tarolisol's Avatar
Tarolisol Tarolisol is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: calgary
Posts: 1,020
Tarolisol is on a distinguished road
Default

Looks good, my only critisism is that with only 24" hight you wont get the effect you are looking for with the low and high points on the right. But i could be wrong, ill keep watching and see.
__________________
Sean

Back in the good ole days
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-16-2006, 04:10 AM
andrewsk's Avatar
andrewsk andrewsk is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 285
andrewsk is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tarolisol
Looks good, my only critisism is that with only 24" hight you wont get the effect you are looking for with the low and high points on the right. But i could be wrong, ill keep watching and see.
I agree with the 24 height but the 30 deep was WAY more important to me as I want the illusion of open water more than height.

That said, I could have gone 72x30x30 but then I would need more powerful bulbs and longer arms

I can still get the low and high points this way and it should be more gradual.

We will see.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-16-2006, 05:30 AM
albert_dao albert_dao is offline
Good Guy Albert
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,035
albert_dao will become famous soon enough
Send a message via MSN to albert_dao
Default

I'm going to second the comment about Fudge's work. It is simply AMAZING.
__________________
This and that.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-16-2006, 05:44 AM
Midknight's Avatar
Midknight Midknight is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Surrey, B.C.
Posts: 499
Midknight is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to Midknight Send a message via Yahoo to Midknight
Default

Put me down for an "Amazing looking tank". I also agree with the depth vs high look.
__________________
Enquiring minds want to know…
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-16-2006, 08:19 PM
Jaws's Avatar
Jaws Jaws is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,255
Jaws is on a distinguished road
Default

Andrew,

Everything sounds great so far. The theory is great. I can't wait to see it in action. The only thing that stands out with me is that you don't want a back wall covered in coralline because it's distracting which I agree with. But using a starboard bottom will also cover in corraline. Is that what you'd prefer or do you want a more natural sand look? Myself, I really enjoy the bright white look a sandbed displays in a reef setup but prefer the benefits of a barebottom tank. Since you're already putting a lot of time and effort into planning and building this system, you may want to look into a false sandbed by glueing sand down on to the starboard. Just a suggestion but if it's done right it can give you the best of both worlds. I look forward to seeing your progress on this since I plan on building a very similar system in the near future. Good luck.
__________________
Jason
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-16-2006, 08:35 PM
TheReefGeek's Avatar
TheReefGeek TheReefGeek is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 1,503
TheReefGeek is on a distinguished road
Default

If you paint the back wall of the tank, could you still clean it with a mag float? Or will that scratch the paint off?
__________________
Rory

Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 06-16-2006, 08:39 PM
Jaws's Avatar
Jaws Jaws is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,255
Jaws is on a distinguished road
Default

My guess is it would probably scratch the paint off eventually. The only problem I have with paint is it's permanant. If you ever decided to make the tank a three sided viewing tank in the future then you're stuck with the back wall painted. I've always wanted to try a mirror or a mirrored material maybe like window tint. Other than seeing your own reflection sometimes it would definitely make it look like there's a lot more depth.
__________________
Jason
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.