Should I get the Phosphurous Checker?

[mikellini]

This thread is making me feel better about getting the phosphate checker vs phosphorus. As it is, I think there's too much number-chasing going on in this hobby.

[lastlight]

Originally Posted by mikellini

This thread is making me feel better about getting the phosphate checker vs phosphorus. As it is, I think there's too much number-chasing going on in this hobby.

if you like zero readings i highly recommend the phosphate checker =)

[Aquattro]

Originally Posted by lastlight

if you like zero readings i highly recommend the phosphate checker =)

Agreed. As long as mine says 0, I don't worry about it.

[lastlight]

Originally Posted by Aquattro

Agreed. As long as mine says 0, I don't worry about it.

you're running a sand bed right?

[Aquattro]

Originally Posted by lastlight

you're running a sand bed right?

gobyless, yes.

[mikellini]

Originally Posted by lastlight

if you like zero readings i highly recommend the phosphate checker =)

If you're doing it right, a zero reading is good enough. Even if it's actually 0.04 (which is possible with a zero reading), that's low enough. If I knew for a fact it was 0.04, I wouldn't try to chase numbers and lower it to 0.03. And as long as you have fish and are feeding enough, there will always be enough trace phosphorus in the water for hard corals.

My point is that if phosphates are a problem, it will read above 0, and if it doesn't and I'm having a problem, then phosphates aren't the problem.

[mikellini]

Wow there's gotta be a better way to say that haha