Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 08-30-2014, 07:23 PM
mikellini mikellini is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Vernon BC
Posts: 223
mikellini is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sphelps View Post
Disagree, if for some reason I wanted to remove bacteria from the water column I could change 100% of the water which would be far more effective than what a skimmer could do. Ultimately changing a given amount of water on a certain frequency would compare directly to what a skimmer would accomplish, same as removing any organics. But that's all pointless information irrelevant to anything we're talking about here, the comparison was only made based on the common misconception large water changes are harmful because they remove beneficial bacteria, so I was making the same comment relating to large skimmers...
Again that's a poor example. Bacteria multiply exponentially, it's not like removing a dissolved organic. Doing a 100% water change would remove all of the bacteria in the water (once), a skimmer will remove continuously.

I agree, a bit off topic. Sorry for that
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 08-30-2014, 09:55 PM
Aquattro's Avatar
Aquattro Aquattro is offline
Just a guy..
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 18,053
Aquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikellini View Post
Doing a 100% water change would remove all of the bacteria in the water (once), a skimmer will remove continuously.
Here's my take on that. I don't care at all about any bacteria in water, so if it's there or not, makes no difference. The amount free in the water column is insignificant, so let the skimmer take out however much it wants.
__________________
Brad
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 08-30-2014, 10:25 PM
Wheelman76's Avatar
Wheelman76 Wheelman76 is offline
Jedi Master Reefer
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 617
Wheelman76 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquattro View Post
Here's my take on that. I don't care at all about any bacteria in water, so if it's there or not, makes no difference. The amount free in the water column is insignificant, so let the skimmer take out however much it wants.

+1
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 08-30-2014, 10:29 PM
mikellini mikellini is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Vernon BC
Posts: 223
mikellini is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquattro View Post
Here's my take on that. I don't care at all about any bacteria in water, so if it's there or not, makes no difference. The amount free in the water column is insignificant, so let the skimmer take out however much it wants.
If you're doing zeovit or dosing carbon, there will be a significant amount of bacteria in the water column at times. Enough that you can see clumps
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 08-30-2014, 10:31 PM
SoloSK71 SoloSK71 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 374
SoloSK71 is on a distinguished road
Default

Going back to your original post, I suggest that you get a skimmer that is rated for your water volume as 'heavily stocked' and leave it at that.

Charles
__________________
Where did my rum go?!

Success in this hobby does not count how you spend your money, it counts how you spend your time.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 08-30-2014, 10:33 PM
Aquattro's Avatar
Aquattro Aquattro is offline
Just a guy..
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 18,053
Aquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikellini View Post
If you're doing zeovit or dosing carbon, there will be a significant amount of bacteria in the water column at times. Enough that you can see clumps
Nope, sorry, no clumps. And if there were clumps, that's bound and probably not really active in what I want bacteria to be doing, and therefore, again, insignificant. The only bacteria I'm concerned with are those on substrate, which are not removed in any amount, by any means, that concerns me.
__________________
Brad
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 08-30-2014, 10:53 PM
Aquattro's Avatar
Aquattro Aquattro is offline
Just a guy..
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 18,053
Aquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoloSK71 View Post
Going back to your original post, I suggest that you get a skimmer that is rated for your water volume as 'heavily stocked' and leave it at that.

Charles
Yes, I think that's the real answer, just thought it would be an interesting discussion
__________________
Brad
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 08-30-2014, 10:54 PM
SoloSK71 SoloSK71 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 374
SoloSK71 is on a distinguished road
Default

It has been and is. I just suffer from the guy tendency to offer solutions instead of discussing things

Charles
__________________
Where did my rum go?!

Success in this hobby does not count how you spend your money, it counts how you spend your time.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 08-30-2014, 11:38 PM
mikellini mikellini is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Vernon BC
Posts: 223
mikellini is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquattro View Post
Nope, sorry, no clumps. And if there were clumps, that's bound and probably not really active in what I want bacteria to be doing, and therefore, again, insignificant. The only bacteria I'm concerned with are those on substrate, which are not removed in any amount, by any means, that concerns me.
When dosing carbon (and zeo is carbon dosing as well), a biofilm of bacteria is formed. It can form on the sand, rock, zeolites, carbon/gfo, biopellets, glass - whatever. This occurs because dosing organic carbon removes a limiting factor in growth, allowing nitrogen processing bacteria to thrive. These ARE the bacteria you're concerned with. The 'clumps' or biomass bacteria occur when the biofilm becomes too thick, and excess bacteria break off (also happens when shaking zeolites and releasing 'mulm'). But this is just a visual example of what already occurs when dosing carbon; the bacterial count in the water column goes up. You actually WANT to skim/remove these because in doing so you also remove nitrogen and phosphorus from the system. So while it's true that generally you shouldn't be concerned about removing 'too much' bacteria from the water column by protein skimming, that doesn't mean it doesn't happen. It happens to a degree in every reef aquarium, and moreso in those that dose organic carbon.

BTW I do feel this is relevant to the conversation, as dosing carbon (and the resulting increase in bacteria) should actually be considered as an increase in the bioload of an aquarium IMO. That is, if you are dosing carbon, you should increase the capacity of your skimmer accordingly.

Last edited by mikellini; 08-30-2014 at 11:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 08-30-2014, 11:44 PM
Aquattro's Avatar
Aquattro Aquattro is offline
Just a guy..
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 18,053
Aquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the rough
Default

Like you said, excess bacteria. The ones I don't care about. Maybe I'm just not understanding your point, but I will agree that aggressive skimming is desirable to remove this excess.
__________________
Brad
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.