Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Product Review and Equipment Forum > Filtration and Skimmer Specific

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-09-2011, 03:01 PM
ALang ALang is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta
Posts: 614
ALang is on a distinguished road
Default

I checked mine: 4" across the neck. (NAC 7).
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-09-2011, 05:47 PM
viperfish's Avatar
viperfish viperfish is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Dawson Creek
Posts: 684
viperfish is on a distinguished road
Default

Any reason why you're decision is limited to Bubble Magus?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-11-2011, 05:31 AM
RuGlu6 RuGlu6 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver PoMo
Posts: 829
RuGlu6 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by medhatreefguy View Post
Any reason why you're decision is limited to Bubble Magus?
500 l/h air intake, small footprint, price, easy to clean, silent pump
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-11-2011, 09:02 AM
BlueWorldAquatic's Avatar
BlueWorldAquatic BlueWorldAquatic is offline
Vendor
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,160
BlueWorldAquatic is on a distinguished road
Default

If money is an issue, get A nac6. For the $50 more I would get a nac7, cone skimmers are much more efficient.

If footprint is important, the nac6 will fit in more places than the nac7
__________________

Store Location


Twitter


Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-11-2011, 03:28 PM
ALang ALang is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta
Posts: 614
ALang is on a distinguished road
Default

I love my NAC7 from BWA.
Pulled out sooo much stuff that it astonishes me every couple of days!
Another plus: it is heck of a lot more easy on the wallet than most full-sized skimmer.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-12-2011, 05:35 AM
RuGlu6 RuGlu6 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver PoMo
Posts: 829
RuGlu6 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueWorldAquatic View Post
If money is an issue, get A nac6. For the $50 more I would get a nac7, cone skimmers are much more efficient.

If footprint is important, the nac6 will fit in more places than the nac7
how much are these two (NAC7 & NAC 6A) at your store?
What would a shipping to Vancouver cost?
do they come with pin wheel or mesh impeller ?
what is the neck diameter of the NAC6?
220volts or 110V?
thx.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-12-2011, 01:50 PM
LeeR's Avatar
LeeR LeeR is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: East van
Posts: 436
LeeR is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to LeeR
Default

swc 160 cone
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-14-2011, 05:06 AM
RuGlu6 RuGlu6 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver PoMo
Posts: 829
RuGlu6 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LeeR View Post
swc 160 cone
I looked it up and it looks a lot like a Nac7. Even pump is the same.
Is SWC 160 cone cheeper? who makes it?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-22-2011, 12:49 PM
nlreefguy nlreefguy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: St. John's, NL
Posts: 295
nlreefguy is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueWorldAquatic View Post
If money is an issue, get A nac6. For the $50 more I would get a nac7, cone skimmers are much more efficient.

If footprint is important, the nac6 will fit in more places than the nac7
I wasn't aware that this had been proven so definitively re: cone skimmers. My impression was that recent research is showing no significant difference between cone and cylindircal skimmers.

http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2010/1/aafeature
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-22-2011, 07:11 PM
RuGlu6 RuGlu6 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver PoMo
Posts: 829
RuGlu6 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nlreefguy View Post
I wasn't aware that this had been proven so definitively re: cone skimmers. My impression was that recent research is showing no significant difference between cone and cylindircal skimmers.

http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2010/1/aafeature
Wow, this is a very good read, an eye opener and grounding for sure. Brings all the hype about "new" and "latest &greatest" right down.

LOL i might just boost up a flow a little on my large DIY downdraft air driven skimmer and be on par with BK on TOC removal ! LOL, because my skimmer is driven by a huge air pump, and 2 air stones last up to 6 month. A waist cup wash on it takes less time to clean then on my Deltec MCE600
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.