BM Nano Skimmer comes to Canada

Aqua-Digital · #1 05-10-2010, 01:47 AM

On very low bio loading yes, but leaves no room for expansion.

I am running a BM150pro on my 60 gallon.

Flash · #2 05-10-2010, 01:56 AM

how much does that go for and is it hob?

Aqua-Digital · #3 05-10-2010, 02:40 AM

Red sea max - depends where abouts, it has two options for hanging, if you can give more details (pics) I can assist more.

BM150pro is sump installed and $379.

Go for the BMqq then upgrade where needs be

Flash · #4 05-10-2010, 03:22 AM

lol all my tanks will be sumpless so that won't work! lol but thanks

TheKid · #5 05-10-2010, 05:00 AM

So what skimmer would you advise for red sea max considering that a RSM is sumpless

BlueWorldAquatic · #6 05-10-2010, 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bean

lol all my tanks will be sumpless so that won't work! lol but thanks

The BM-qq will be perfect for the 65gal I'm giving you.

Ken

Aqua-Digital · #7 05-10-2010, 06:14 PM

Yep for 65 gallon the BMqq will really do well. it can really pull some cr*p this baby.

dankent · #8 05-28-2010, 01:40 PM

The RSM isnt sumpless ... just has a sump in the back and not like the traditional sump under the tank setup....

--cut from RSM Club--
The 70mm cylinder (2.76 inches) should fit the back but if you go look at the images, I think the additional space needed by their mounting bracket would make it a no-go in the back of a 130 or 130D. Looks like it would sit up pretty high also - no closed hood or at least no skimmer flap.
--end cut--

Hope that helps ..