Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-08-2010, 06:02 AM
Funky_Fish14's Avatar
Funky_Fish14 Funky_Fish14 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: (Close to) Millet, Alberta
Posts: 1,153
Funky_Fish14 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to Funky_Fish14
Default

I would like to second the check-valve suckage thing... although I would like to say that please dont even design a system that uses or relies on one. IMO, and in my experience... they totally suck. MOST check valves (have seen many diff brands in action) fail. Stuff either gums up in them or the 'flap' if its rubberized 'gives out' or gets deformed into the 'open' shape.

Some are around that almost surely will not fail, but for me, thats not good enough. Why not simply design a system that doesn't worry about one, and simply takes care of itself hassle free, 100% guarenteed not to leak, and saves you the money of buying one. Just my opinion. (You can certainly include one if you want, but in a well-designed system, it wont be necessary).
__________________
No more tanks - Laying off the ReefCrack for awhile!
Cheers,
Chris
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-08-2010, 06:15 AM
Bloodasp Bloodasp is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 337
Bloodasp is on a distinguished road
Default

You could terminate it an inch or 2 below where your return goes inside your overflow. Just point the nozzle slightly downwards, That could alleviate the issue of the same water coming from the sump immediately going back into the sump.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.