![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Christy's Reef Blog My 180 Build Every electronic component is shipped with smoke stored deep inside.... only a real genius can find a way to set it free. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() QT for new fish YES!
QT for the ones that in the display tank NO! too much stress + infection+net scratching |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I've done the QT thing and lost fish as well. First time believe was a NH3 spike (can rise surprisingly fast) on a newly set up QT.
Last time I tried QT was for a new fish. I placed a Potters in my 20g fuge that had been set up for awhile. I isolated it from the display (thought if something did show up, would just toss the macro), added a heater, SS65, monitored ammonia and still the fish died after about 3 weeks. Really believe in the idea of the QT, just not having much luck with them.
__________________
my tank |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() The QT issue should NOT be up for debate. It should be used for all new livestock and existing wounded/sick specimen Period.
The poped-eye sickness was induced due to environmental stress factors. ie: existing wound on eye, chemical imbalance in saltwater causing immunodeficiencies at the eye site. the best way to treat poped eye, in my opinion, is to use freshwater dips. certainly, there will be additional stress induced to the specimen when catching it. but on the contrary, what is the chances for the fish to survive without intervention? My experience tells me it is far, far cheaper to have a new or wounded specimen die in your QT than watching your main tank inhabitants die off one after another slowly. The QT have saved me so much money in the past 5 years, that i am convinced this is the best practice to be employed at all times.
__________________
check it out! members.shaw.ca/aussiefishy |