![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() One thing I know, BOTH my skimmers suck, and Im to broke to get BK's LMAO
__________________
Dan Pesonen Umm, a tank or 5 |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Tunze gives you a little more help by listing a "maximum" tank size for their skimmers which you subtract down from depending on what you are keeping in the tank (e.g. SPS, LPS, softies, FO).
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() little dated and yes could be problems but here:
http://www.aquariumcontrollers.com/a...p#skimmerchart
__________________
my tank |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I'm recalling that study that recently tried to measure WHAT was being removed by skimmers and how quickly various models removed it.
I believe that their conclusions were that the "larger" skimmer (the one the processed a larger volume of water per hour) removed the measured stuff more quickly, but that all the skimmers tested reduced the measured stuff to about the same level given time. It struck me that a big difference between the test environment and an actual aquarium is that the aquarium continually generates new waste so a truly undersized skimmer won't ever get the chance to catch up and waste could accumulate. Yes, I agree...it is more about bioload than actual water volume. IMHO, size matters. In order to increase the amount of water it can process per hour, the chamber needs to get bigger. Increasing the flow rate with a smaller chamber just reduces the amount of time the water is in contact with the air bubbles (dwell time). In my case, I wanted to get to 1.5x tank volume per hour (600gph) with 2 minute dwell time inside the skimmer. That means that I need to have a 20 gallon chamber....yikes! After that, I didn't really pay attention to what the skimmer says it is rated for.
__________________
400 gal reef. Established April, 2007. 3 Sequence Dart, RM12-4 skimmer, 2 x OM4Ways, Yellow Tang, Maroon Clown (pair), Blonde Naso Tang, Vlamingi Tang, Foxface Rabbit, Unicorn Tang, 2 Pakistani Butterflies and a few coral gobies My Tank: http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=28436 Last edited by untamed; 10-09-2009 at 08:14 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() BK will tell you in a heartbeat that you can overdo skimming by buying a unit that is oversize, it simply doesn't work, or should I say doesn't work properly.
I know there is a distinct difference between having the skimmer in the tank with no sump as compared to having a sump with a 10 times turnover, it just isn't the same, the tank install though ugly will work better every time, explaining it is a different matter. Last edited by golf nut; 10-10-2009 at 07:55 AM. |
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Palmer |
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() In sump works better because of the overflow effect. The high specific gravity in salt tanks results in proteins/organics rising. the idea of the sump and overflow system is that the overflow constantly sends the top water from the display to the sump.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Hi there, so you are suggesting that the best way to operate a skimmer is to take water directly from the display tank and return it there instead of doing that from the sump?
Quote:
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I am suggesting that you have the sump turnover rate at the correct volume to get maximum results from the skimmer, typically this will be a lot less than the previously suggested 10x rate.
|