![]() |
|
View Poll Results: How many of you use RO water and how many dont ? | |||
i use RO |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
140 | 70.71% |
Dont use RO |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
51 | 25.76% |
i use ro but sometimes use tap water ETC |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 3.54% |
Voters: 198. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() ya
i run no ro and i dont have a problem at all no bad algae so far lol sps are growing good so i dont know is it worth it have been thinking about just running a d/i too wonder if just that would do any good ? this is going to turn in to a great debate i can see it now lol
__________________
65 gal tank 40 gal sump 20 gal Q tank 75 gal total frag system 200gal system in the works 4 year exp salty |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Started the hobby with tap water and had Cyano.
The Cyano cleared up around the time I switched to ro/di but by then tank had been up for awhile and I added more circulation. Can't say 100% the ro made the improvement but can't see going back to tap as I have one less variable to deal with. Now if I was in some areas of the country where the tap water has a TDS of 20, not sure...
__________________
my tank |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I use tap water and Prime. Our water source here in Delta is from a pristine watershed. If our water came from a river and was subject to industrial, municipal and agricultural contamination, I would probably consider RO.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Always used tap water and prime
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Always use RO/DI.... not just RO. Trust me guys, you want to start with the cleanest source water possible. It is usually the catalyst for all algae problems.
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() RO/DI exclusively
__________________
Dan Pesonen Umm, a tank or 5 |
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Your filtration needs are completely dependent on your water source, many people using RO don't need to as their water source is good, others do. Here in Saskatoon I get a TDS around 200 from the tap, I require an RO membrane to get a reading in a range I consider acceptable. Many other places, especially in BC, get readings in this range right out of the tap. In addition TDS can be misleading, it gives no indication of what the solids are and since some are worse than others it's hard to say what is safe and what is not.
It's a tricky subject, some will swear by one method and others by another. But it really depends on your water source which can even vary greatly within the same city. I would personally say that if you can get a TDS reading of 25 or less without RO you really don't need it, but that's just my personal opinion. I do however believe you should use some kind of sediment filter and a carbon block at the very least to remove the chlorine and other chemicals, I think is would be much better than using additives. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Ro/di
|