Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-20-2009, 06:19 AM
Delphinus's Avatar
Delphinus Delphinus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 12,896
Delphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via MSN to Delphinus
Default

Not really anything to do with your question, .. but have you considered making it 24" wide and 20" tall? The aquascaping possibilities are better with more depth and you can have the lights closer down.. And maybe the load spread will be a tiny little bit better?
__________________
-- Tony
My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-20-2009, 08:04 AM
fooser's Avatar
fooser fooser is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Alberta
Posts: 213
fooser is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delphinus View Post
Not really anything to do with your question, .. but have you considered making it 24" wide and 20" tall? The aquascaping possibilities are better with more depth and you can have the lights closer down.. And maybe the load spread will be a tiny little bit better?
This is exactly what I was thinking, Tony! Great minds think alike
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-20-2009, 02:08 PM
fragNplug fragNplug is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: calgary
Posts: 180
fragNplug is on a distinguished road
Default

I agree with what everyone else has said too, and also would like to point out your stand has alot to do with it, if you have a stand that is totally flat on the bottom, eg, a piece of plywood, the weight is distributed more equally across the full area, unlike a stand with just rails or independent legs.

here is a very long artical about floors and load distribution.
http://www.ashireporter.org/articles...es.aspx?id=570
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-20-2009, 02:16 PM
banditpowdercoat's Avatar
banditpowdercoat banditpowdercoat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: 100 mile hse BC
Posts: 2,568
banditpowdercoat is on a distinguished road
Default

The plywood thing is only for the floor itself, not the joists. If you have "rails" on the bottom of your stand, they will spread the load out over the joists. Plywood really does not carry any load when laid flat. It's strength is on edge.
__________________
Dan Pesonen


Umm, a tank or 5
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-20-2009, 02:40 PM
fragNplug fragNplug is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: calgary
Posts: 180
fragNplug is on a distinguished road
Default

i was suggesting plywood as a base, to ensure he was not using just 4 or 6 legs on direct points to the floor.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-20-2009, 02:44 PM
banditpowdercoat's Avatar
banditpowdercoat banditpowdercoat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: 100 mile hse BC
Posts: 2,568
banditpowdercoat is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fragNplug View Post
i was suggesting plywood as a base, to ensure he was not using just 4 or 6 legs on direct points to the floor.
And I'm saying using plywood as a base will have no effect on joist loading. Only on Point pressure on the floor material itself. Acctually, If you had carpet, a plywood base would be a detriment, as it would bow in the middle and not be flat.
__________________
Dan Pesonen


Umm, a tank or 5
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-20-2009, 03:51 PM
kien's Avatar
kien kien is offline
¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸. ><(((º>
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 7,665
kien will become famous soon enoughkien will become famous soon enough
Default

Great information everyone, thanks! The house was built in 1991. No 'I' beams, just 2x6s running the length of the house but no longer than 12 or 13 feet to the nearest supporting beam as far as I can see from the furnace room. Hardwood floors on the main floor.

I thought about 24" deep by 20" tall, but not sure if that's suitable as a room divider in my space. The 90 gallon that is there now works perfectly at 18" deep and 24" tall. I have a 4" sand bed which has always worked well for me so the depth of the water is actually only 18"/20". So I figured I'd keep the same height, make it 2 feet longer and give myself a couple more inches to play with.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-07-2009, 07:52 AM
Coleus Coleus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Calgary NW
Posts: 1,179
Coleus is on a distinguished road
Default Go

Ok, I am doing a little math to figure out I am not that good at Math btw) so let's see if this makes sense

According to this http://www.tpic.ca/3_specified_loads.pdf, our home floor live load is 1.9 Kpa which is around 40 pounds per square foot.

Your tank is 72x20 so roughly 12 sq ft in total.
Now calculate how many pounds of your tank:
a full water of 150 gallon is approx 1224 lbs
+ 280 lbs (sum) + 100 lbs (stand + equipment)
so that is around 1604 lbs

so 1604 lbs over 12 sqft is 133 lbs per sqft. So you are 83 lbs over per sqft

I am probably wrong here lol
________
Clk-Class

Last edited by Coleus; 04-30-2011 at 04:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-07-2009, 07:55 AM
Coleus Coleus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Calgary NW
Posts: 1,179
Coleus is on a distinguished road
Default Go

good article to read btw http://badmanstropicalfish.com/articles/article28.html
________
Ipad accessories

Last edited by Coleus; 04-30-2011 at 04:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.