![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() try one in a nano
__________________
72 gal bowfromt mixed reef sps dominated, 25 gal mineral mud type sump/refugium Skimmerless 2x250 14000k phoenix hqi 2x96 pc actinic, 50x flow |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() i saw that photo and the first thing that popped into my mind was "photoshop!" ... but to my surprise it really is a real fish!
http://www.fishbase.org/summary/spec...ry.php?id=4479 |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Sorry, but I'm a fly fisherman too and, that would be awesome to land that beast on the Zambize river in Africa....fish on!!!
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() OMG, Are those for real? I will never take another step into an ocean, lake or bath tub
again. Hope when the end does come we are not surrounded by water. But I will stand out as I will be the one at the very top of the highest moutain, building or whatever. The third picture looks sort of humanistic in a creepy kind of way. |
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I'm pretty sure that all of the ones that GSP posted, with the exception of the deep sea angler, are photoshoped. Funny though
__________________
75 gallon with 20 gallon sump in the works. R. Bacchiega. Tattooer I didn't smack you, I simply High Fived your face. I've got so much glue on my pants it looks like a Friday night gone horribly wrong. |
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() well i know for a fact that the first (the name escapes me at the moment) and the last (the angler) are indeed real fish. Ive never seen the middle two myself.
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() All I will say is that the second fish was discovered in a lake in Utah a few years back--100% real fish, no photoshopping. There might be one that is shopped but Im not saying
![]() |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Yeah, the first and the last ones are real, the second one looks mummified, and the third one....???
|