![]() |
|
View Poll Results: What is your level of interest in ATS? | |||
Never Heard of it |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
95 | 64.63% |
Read some, interesting, but I'll stick to my skimmer |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
31 | 21.09% |
I want one for my tank |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
16 | 10.88% |
I'm already running one |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 3.40% |
Voters: 147. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() 186scrubber_screen.jpg
scrubber.jpg The screen in my was fairly stiff. About 240 sq. in. Lit with two 65w power compacts @ 67k. The pic of the scrubber was when it was new. Its the 250 larger model once sold by IA. Was designed to be a nice looking fixture, to set on your sumpless aquarium, something like a 120 and up, behind something like a Hamilton or PFO duel halide fixture hood. Thus the high price. I suppose any screen growing algae would work fine. The dump feature of one like mine, provided the tank with a surge but more so the algae with back & forth motion and oxygen when exposed, which is suppose to make the turf a more efficient filter than submersed algaes. It worked well when I used it, with no measurable phosphate, nitrate, nitrite, ammonia, etc. I never used a phosphate removed until recently. HOWEVER, I did run a good skimmer with it and despite whats being said on the net, never found that the scrubber could handle that size tank alone with no skimmer. I suppose in many situations with certain types of tanks it would do fine. And again, despite whats being said, we scrapped our algae from the screen into a sink. I would say the skimmer helped with preventing water discoloration, so as much carbon was not required. I wish I lived where I could again run a large tank and set it up as a scrubber only aquarium which would maintain species that flourish in that environment.
__________________
Doug |
Tags |
algae, ats, scrubber, turf |
|
|