![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Still at work so no pics yet but I had a thought and did some investigating. With all the concern about the energy draw, I did some "comparative shopping" to find out what other pumps with similar flow rates are pulling.
Hydor Seltz l40 @740gph is drawing 55 watts Sedra KSP 9000 @900gph is drawing 90 watts Eheim 1262 @900gph is drawing 80 watts Quiet one 4000 @1017gph is drawing 50 watts So if we pop the Resun in there at 70 watts/1000gph it's smack in the middle for power consumption beating out the eheim and the sedra. That puts it a little better into perspective as far as power consumption goes anyways |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() We're still running FW in ours trying to get rid of the dead corraline on the back but even with just that it's pulling out some snot, so far I'm impressed
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
For example, the Sedra 9000 on my WM RX200 pulls about 1,000 to 1,100 lph at 47 watts (not 90W) - these are actual observed measurements by myself and consistent with the manufacturer's ratings. I expect the Resun pumps to pull less power than their "water" rating, but the question is how much and at what amount of air flow? What I am surprised about is that the distributor/marketer (Proline, I believe) didn't provide these numbers in their marketing materials as with most skimmers. Other than construction quality and low noise, BK marketing is all about very low wattage draw to very high air draw. It's not that hard to determine the numbers. This is why I am somewhat concerned about the actual performance of the Resun pumps if no one has bothered to publish them. So my offer to test a vertex skimmer (or any skimmer) in the Lower Mainland stands. Last edited by fkshiu; 11-06-2008 at 03:31 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() It's not like we don't have busy lives, but it sounds like we're off to test some skimmers this weekend
![]() ![]()
__________________
If you see it, can take care of it, better get it or put it on hold. Otherwise, it'll be gone & you'll regret it! |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Here are some photos of the vertex IN-250 in action. I think the Vertex is the king of the low-end after having a few weeks experience with one. Hydor's king of midrange, Bubbleking king of high end and Tunze king of the small form-factor. My only gripe is the IN-250 is so damned tall and the cup's a bit of a pain to remove without spilling skimmate. You need like 32" to remove the cup n all. But the performance is pretty damned good.
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Everything I put in my tank is fully dependant on me. Last edited by kwirky; 11-06-2008 at 07:59 PM. |
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() the nog on there looks pretty nice... I wonder how this rates up to the octo extreme... decisions decisions.
__________________
- John - 3x20g Display Established June 08|Koralia nano, 1, 4|Euroreef Skimmer|250W MH retro kit|Mag 18 return|RODI 120g Display Established Jan 1, 09|Vortech MP40|Koralia 4|I-Tech 100 w Tunze 9410.04A|Aquactinics Constellation 7x54W|Mag 18 return|RODI |
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() SO, I finally got around to taking some pictures. These shots are from earlier tonight so say 24-32hrs of running. I moved from a Tunze 9010 so adjusting this has been a little hit and miss for me. About half the skimmate that you see is a direct result of me overflowing the skimmer a little as I play around with "tuning" it. Still not sure if I've got it set properly but I guess time will tell!!
Enjoy ![]() ![]() ![]() |
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Delicious!
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I recently purchased the 180 (like 3 weeks ago) and haven't put it to the test as yet. I was drawn to this skimmer from what I've read in user's reviews AND the very reasonable price, BUT since I have purchased it they raised the price by another $75. That's a huge price increase (percentage-wise)! <thumbsdown>
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Very much like another euro reef knock off, made in china, tought id get one for my small tank.. pump died it in 3 days
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
skimmer, vertex |
|
|