Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > Other > Lounge

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-03-2007, 03:25 AM
andsoitgoes's Avatar
andsoitgoes andsoitgoes is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Secret Location
Posts: 433
andsoitgoes is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MoeReefer View Post
I agree with the stats. If I here one more stat about how if the Canucks are down 3/1 in a series on the second week of the third day of round two... I'm going to freek out. I like Gary Vaulck as an analist, he talks about who did what right and wrong and breaks it down without a lot of meaningless trivia.
Havings said that, GO CANUCKS!!!!
Love em when there winning, love em there losing too
UGH - I hear you!

"When the canucks are down 3/1 on home ice in the 2nd of the 4 game series and when it's rained, hailed AND there's been a peal of thunder, the Lord Himself came down from the sky and blessed the ice, that's caused them to win 1/1,340 games!"

I'll slap 'em.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-03-2007, 06:12 AM
LostMind LostMind is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Port Moody
Posts: 821
LostMind is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to LostMind
Default

Was at the game... was positive we were going to win until suddenly, the canucks stopped playing...

So many things I wish they would do better... too many to get into.

Oh well, I'll still have my tickets next year... a fan even when we are losing.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-03-2007, 06:48 AM
andsoitgoes's Avatar
andsoitgoes andsoitgoes is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Secret Location
Posts: 433
andsoitgoes is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LostMind View Post
Was at the game... was positive we were going to win until suddenly, the canucks stopped playing...

So many things I wish they would do better... too many to get into.

Oh well, I'll still have my tickets next year... a fan even when we are losing.
I get a lot of flack for being a "bandwagon jumper" - but I don't even consider myself that - I just like a team that plays well. If we play well and lose, fine - but if the team I'm going to see has no consistency with their play, THAT I have issues with.

It's one thing to go see a team that "ah shucks, that was a rough night, you know that's not how they usually play" - but it's another when you go see a team that does GREAT for 2/3rds of the game and then stuffs a sock in it for the end.

It's frustrating and it's a SHAME - This kind of stuff is supposed to happen to "young, inexperienced" teams - this team is anything but, and this "curse" has been with them since Messier came/left.

It'd be another thing if they actually hit full rock bottom (similiar to teams like the Bears or Bulls) and then rose up from the ashes - but to be a team that's more moody than - well, I won't go there. It's frustrating, and makes me want to scream. I'd like to get into it, but there's only so much "What was THAT?????" that one person can take
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-04-2007, 06:56 AM
Chin_Lee's Avatar
Chin_Lee Chin_Lee is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Surrey, B.C.
Posts: 2,208
Chin_Lee is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to Chin_Lee
Default too sad

what a sad ending for Luongo - superstar that made one error that ended the season. Good run regardless but they need to get better forwards. GO OTTAWA GO
__________________
____________
If people don't die, it wouldn't make living important.
And why do we fall? So we can learn to pick ourselves up.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-04-2007, 01:09 PM
Ruth's Avatar
Ruth Ruth is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Fort St. John, British Columbia
Posts: 1,605
Ruth is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chin_Lee View Post
what a sad ending for Luongo - superstar that made one error that ended the season. Good run regardless but they need to get better forwards. GO OTTAWA GO
What he said - sad to see the game and season end on a fluke shot and what I thought was a penalty.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-04-2007, 01:27 PM
Zylumn Zylumn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary , NW
Posts: 274
Zylumn is on a distinguished road
Default

Well said Chin Now GO OTTAWA GO
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-04-2007, 09:22 PM
DiscusZ DiscusZ is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 294
DiscusZ is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to DiscusZ
Default

Well Fluke or no fluke Luongo should of concentrated on the puck rather than waving at the ref. He caused the canucks the game right there,


The play according to anyone was a fair legal hit If you take a look at the replay he had his head down along the boards and got nailed I just watched it again definate a clean hit.


Also those who are complaining about the Ducks 1st goal. Didnt vancouver do this toward the end of the season to Calgary? and actually get a goal that way? I am sure it was naslund who dove on Kipper and the puck went in..

well the canucks can hit the links and the playoffs move on..

Lets go Ottawa. I would lov e to see the finals being Ottawa and the Sharks
__________________
Setup: 180G DT, 105G Refuge (approx. 300lbs LR, 150lbs Aragonite)
Hardware: Super Reef Octopus SSS-3000, Tunze ATO, Mag 18 return, 3x MP40W, 2X Koralia 4's Wavemaker
Lighting: 5ft Hamilton Belize Sun (2x250W MH, Blue LEDs) Vertex Calcium Reactor 2x Deltec Pellet Reactors
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-04-2007, 11:13 PM
Quagmire's Avatar
Quagmire Quagmire is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Calgary
Posts: 588
Quagmire is on a distinguished road
Default

Ive been following Ottawa since Calgary was out.Great series so far.
__________________
No matter how hard you try, you can't baptise cats.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-05-2007, 12:16 AM
andsoitgoes's Avatar
andsoitgoes andsoitgoes is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Secret Location
Posts: 433
andsoitgoes is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DiscusZ View Post
Well Fluke or no fluke Luongo should of concentrated on the puck rather than waving at the ref. He caused the canucks the game right there,


The play according to anyone was a fair legal hit If you take a look at the replay he had his head down along the boards and got nailed I just watched it again definate a clean hit.


Also those who are complaining about the Ducks 1st goal. Didnt vancouver do this toward the end of the season to Calgary? and actually get a goal that way? I am sure it was naslund who dove on Kipper and the puck went in..

well the canucks can hit the links and the playoffs move on..

Lets go Ottawa. I would lov e to see the finals being Ottawa and the Sharks
whoa whoa whoa now.

Not to create a fight - but you're blaming probably the #1 reason that the Canucks have done SO well for making ONE mistake?

Luongo didn't cost them squat, their absentee playing is what cost them. Maybe he made a mistake, but the other players on the team have been making mistakes all along. I think the guy deserves a beer and a pat on the back for having to do so much bloody work. Blaming him simply isn't fair or right, that may just be my opinion, but really now..
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.