|
|
|
|
|
#1
01-11-2007, 04:27 AM
|
|||||
|
|||||
Maby 175,250 seems like a little mutch.I am puting 14k 250watt MH on my 30tall and it seems like plenty.
__________________
 "Well that brings up an interesting philosophical question.Is it okay to snitch to the police,on the police."-Rhily Freeman 
|
|
#2
01-11-2007, 08:50 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think you need to take this a bit further and think about what kind of bulb you want to use. A 10000k 150 watt HQI would work just fine for most things provided you are either happy with the colour of the bulb by itself or you had a way to add actinics.
As soon as you think to yourself, "I'd like to try a 14k bulb in there" you're screwed as far as crocea clams or demanding SPS goes. You will see a drop in the amount of light in the correct wavelengths for photosynthesis (measured as PAR) the higher up you go in colour temperature. The drop in PAR between a 10000k bulb and a 14000k bulb can be nearly 50%. If you want to use a bluer bulb you will need the 250w.
|
|
#3
01-12-2007, 01:26 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think I might actually get a custom tank made to better suit the light because the light is 15" wide. I am thinking a 24"L x 15"W x 18ish" deep (need a DSB for my yellowhead jawfish). And BTW the lighting is 10000k and it comes with two colors of actinics. 2 24 Watt t5's of each color(420nm and 460nm)
|
|
#4
01-12-2007, 04:57 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
That simplifies things then. Somebody with more SPS experience may correct me on this but I think you could go with either unit and be happy.
The 250 would give you the option to put your high demand critters almost anywhere where with the 150 would still require a bit more planning and be less flexible. Really fussy stuff would still want to be high and centered. On the downside with the 250 you'd have to be careful with acclimating new additions and some things like zoas and mushrooms would be difficult to place.
|
Hybrid Mode
