Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-04-2006, 09:01 PM
Joe Reefer's Avatar
Joe Reefer Joe Reefer is offline
Masterbaiter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,205
Joe Reefer is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to Joe Reefer
Default

Sounds good, how do you think coral growth will be.
__________________
M2CW
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-04-2006, 09:17 PM
OCDP's Avatar
OCDP OCDP is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,347
OCDP is on a distinguished road
Default

Sounds awesome, but how will LED's compare to a blazing HQI bulb? Interesting though...
__________________
20g BB Mixed Reef // Coralife 150w HQI // AquaC Nano // Koralia 1 & Seio 820 // Jager 200w // AC50
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-04-2006, 09:18 PM
albert_dao albert_dao is offline
Good Guy Albert
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,035
albert_dao will become famous soon enough
Send a message via MSN to albert_dao
Default

That's sexy.

If this is any indication, the capabilities of this unit should be very good:

http://www.nano-reef.com/forums/inde...howtopic=57855
__________________
This and that.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-05-2006, 12:37 AM
muck's Avatar
muck muck is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Edmonton, AB (West)
Posts: 4,329
muck is on a distinguished road
Default

added some pics
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-05-2006, 12:34 PM
StirCrazy's Avatar
StirCrazy StirCrazy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 7,872
StirCrazy is on a distinguished road
Default

the problem is they are comparing LUX which tells us diddly squat. now if you can find a report that shows some actual PAR numbers that would be interesting.

Steve
__________________
*everything said above is just my opinion, and may or may not reflect the views of this BBS, its Operators, and its Members. If cornered on any “opinion” I post I will totally deny having ever said this in a Court of Law…Unless I am the right one*

Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-05-2006, 02:12 PM
OCDP's Avatar
OCDP OCDP is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,347
OCDP is on a distinguished road
Default

Very cool, thanks for the pictures.
__________________
20g BB Mixed Reef // Coralife 150w HQI // AquaC Nano // Koralia 1 & Seio 820 // Jager 200w // AC50
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-05-2006, 03:01 PM
TheReefGeek's Avatar
TheReefGeek TheReefGeek is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 1,503
TheReefGeek is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
the problem is they are comparing LUX which tells us diddly squat.
Why is this?

Lux is lumens with area taken into account.
__________________
Rory

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-05-2006, 09:37 PM
Skimmerking's Avatar
Skimmerking Skimmerking is offline
acanthastrea freak
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Virden, Manitoba
Posts: 5,690
Skimmerking is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to Skimmerking Send a message via MSN to Skimmerking
Default

Steve I'm with you on this one. How can a small LED give off enough light to sustain the amount of intense lighting. I could may be see it working on a small tank. like 10" deep. But to see have a tank 24-30" to give off that much light. Sure the light is there but to allow SPS to grow or LPS you would need lots and lots of LEDs.
__________________
180 starfire front, LPS, millipora
Doesn't matter how much you have been reading until you take the plunge.
You don't know as much as you think.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-11-2006, 11:36 PM
StirCrazy's Avatar
StirCrazy StirCrazy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 7,872
StirCrazy is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheReefGeek
Why is this?

Lux is lumens with area taken into account.
yes it is, but it tells us nothing of the quality of the light. there is only a specific band of light that is usable for photosynthis and that is what is important to us.

Snappy, we had a guy on here that was going to send me a luxton star and driver "on loan" for me to run PAR tests as he was claiming how good they were and that he was going to start producing a LED lighting system.. well in short I sent my address he said they were on the way.. 8 months laiter still nothing.

I do have a PAR sensor and have tested normal LED's very disapointing PAR output. less than 1/20th of a NO actinic bulb, so going by that if a luxton is 10X more powerfull we should still only see 1/2 of the output of a NO tube, but it would take about 5 luxtons to cover the same area.. and at 20.00 a pop it wouldn't be a cheaper method of lighting..

so if anyone has a luxton and driver they could spare for a week or two I will do tests and get some comparitive figures instead of speculation.

Steve
__________________
*everything said above is just my opinion, and may or may not reflect the views of this BBS, its Operators, and its Members. If cornered on any “opinion” I post I will totally deny having ever said this in a Court of Law…Unless I am the right one*

Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.