|
|
|
||||||||
| Portal | PhotoPost Gallery | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| View Poll Results: If skimmers didn't exist, which would be your next choice? | |||
| Wet/Dry (trickle) filter |
   
|
12 | 8.51% |
| Fluidized bed filter |
  
|
5 | 3.55% |
| UV sterilizer |
  
|
9 | 6.38% |
| Mechanical filter |
  
|
10 | 7.09% |
| Live rock/sand bed (exclusively) |
  
|
75 | 53.19% |
| Carbon filter |
  
|
14 | 9.93% |
| Other |
|
16 | 11.35% |
| Voters: 141. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
02-21-2006, 06:43 AM
|
|||||
|
|||||
Water Purification
I assumed that skimming would be the first choice of most people. Please explain your preferred method, and if skimming isn't your first choice, why.
__________________
90gal Starfire mixed reef, 400W MH (Giesemann 13K megachrome/Icecap E-ballast), (2) 54W T5 Giesemann true actinic, 45gal sump (65W 50/50 PC), ASM G-3 Skimmer, Mak 4 return, Sequence Dart closed loop, foam backdrop, 120 lbs LR, 2" sandbed, & 1 dillhole running the show. Last edited by richtg; 02-21-2006 at 06:53 AM. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode
