Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-01-2012, 04:08 AM
NU-2reef's Avatar
NU-2reef NU-2reef is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Burnaby BC
Posts: 151
NU-2reef is on a distinguished road
Default

Nothing wrong with dry rock. Just needs time to get live. Because it lacks beneficial bacteria the rock has no way to deal with the ditritus that settles in the pores and becomes a nutrient factory. That would be why algae is more prevelant to dry rock , just an easier place to thrive on nutrients. Dry rock is better for new tanks and people with patience to wait several months for the bacteria to mature and establish itself.

I used 90% dry rock in my new tank that has been running since nov2011. Still no coral or fish just mb7 and reef fuel. The other 10% is live rock and sand from a well established system. Now my rock is just as live as any with lots of coralline and zero pests.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-01-2012, 04:13 AM
reefwars reefwars is offline
R.I.P.
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 6,186
reefwars will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NU-2reef View Post
Nothing wrong with dry rock. Just needs time to get live. Because it lacks beneficial bacteria the rock has no way to deal with the ditritus that settles in the pores and becomes a nutrient factory. That would be why algae is more prevelant to dry rock , just an easier place to thrive on nutrients. Dry rock is better for new tanks and people with patience to wait several months for the bacteria to mature and establish itself.

I used 90% dry rock in my new tank that has been running since nov2011. Still no coral or fish just mb7 and reef fuel. The other 10% is live rock and sand from a well established system. Now my rock is just as live as any with lots of coralline and zero pests.


so your saying its better to have dry rock and that all this algae is a good sign that the rock is becoming live???and that over time the bacteria will mature and take the algae out??? if it was a tuff of hair algae id say big deal but ifested with bubble algae is a bit extreme considering these are the kind of pest algaes im sure he was trying to avoid.

im still pro live rock bigtime, i know all too many set ups with horrible nutrient problems and dry rocks
__________________
........
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-01-2012, 05:02 AM
NU-2reef's Avatar
NU-2reef NU-2reef is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Burnaby BC
Posts: 151
NU-2reef is on a distinguished road
Default

Not at all. I'm pro live rock as well but all live rock I have purchased have always had some sort of pests that I then have to eradicate. I just prefer to lower the risk.

What I'm trying to say is that dry rock in an established system is not always best because it has no way to manage excess nutrients which explains why pest algae is more susceptible. Had the dry rock been cured and matured outside the system then introduced once matured we would have better luck not having pest algae because it now has beneficial bacteria to help as a biofiltration.

In my case I had the time to allow dry rock to establish itself and I was in no rush to add livestock. I used live rock and sand to seed but it takes a long time which most are not willing to wait.

Both types have their benefits but need to be employed appropriately
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.