![]() |
|
Portal | PhotoPost Gallery | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I used to have tunze230/3 on my older 108 Gal.
it was very quiet, easy to clean, and had an ozone port. These are DOC skimmers (disolved organic carbon skimmers) and will NOT skimm particulate and plancton. I can compare it to my ETSS (check my pictures for the feast full of a skimmate on this monster). and you know what,? my tank was not better with ETSS. That is why when i had a chance a bought tunze 240/3 but never got to use it because i have no sump on my new tank. So i vote for Tunze big time. I know skimmers are very touchy subject and everyone has favorits, but for me its alwaysthe same points to consider when selecting a skimmer 1 Ammount of air mixing. 2 Quietness. 3 easyness of cleanning. 4 Power consumption. the rest is marketing hipe like for example galon rating... gallons do not produce waiste right? animals do. HTH ~~~ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|