Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-02-2012, 07:47 PM
imcosmokramer imcosmokramer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: cleveland
Posts: 296
imcosmokramer is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sphelps View Post
1 is the standard, a tank builder will question the reasoning for design 2.
reasoning for design 2:

1. might be stronger since there return holes are not drilled in a 5x5 section on the top left/right of the pane
2. improved surface skimming

but don't worry, I have reasons for design 1 as well, lol.
__________________


LET HE WHO HAS MADE NO MISTAKES CAST THE FIRST LIVE ROCK.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-02-2012, 07:59 PM
reefgirl189's Avatar
reefgirl189 reefgirl189 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Bonnyville, Alberta
Posts: 601
reefgirl189 is on a distinguished road
Default

I like design #1.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-02-2012, 08:08 PM
CherylMcKay CherylMcKay is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Whitehorse, YT
Posts: 116
CherylMcKay is on a distinguished road
Default

I like design #1 as you wouldn't have go over the top somewhere for the returns.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-02-2012, 08:12 PM
imcosmokramer imcosmokramer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: cleveland
Posts: 296
imcosmokramer is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CherylMcKay View Post
I like design #1 as you wouldn't have go over the top somewhere for the returns.
huge + for #1.

in #2, the would go right over the wier and then to the left or right. The two outside holes would be the returns.
__________________


LET HE WHO HAS MADE NO MISTAKES CAST THE FIRST LIVE ROCK.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-02-2012, 08:26 PM
scubadawg scubadawg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 283
scubadawg is on a distinguished road
Default

Design #1, That's the way my tank is being done in the next 2-3 weeks, with eurobracing
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-02-2012, 08:41 PM
naesco's Avatar
naesco naesco is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,747
naesco is on a distinguished road
Default

#2 It looks longer.
If you choose #1 make the length 6 feet that way you can keep tangs.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-02-2012, 11:43 PM
Dive_dry Dive_dry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: victoria
Posts: 66
Dive_dry is on a distinguished road
Default

i like #2 as that is how i am building my tank but on the long side 72" lots of surface skimming is good
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-02-2012, 08:24 PM
sphelps's Avatar
sphelps sphelps is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lyalta, East of Calgary
Posts: 4,777
sphelps is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by imcosmokramer View Post
reasoning for design 2:

1. might be stronger since there return holes are not drilled in a 5x5 section on the top left/right of the pane
2. improved surface skimming

but don't worry, I have reasons for design 1 as well, lol.
Design 1 is actually stronger, the side pane has virtually no bending stress or membrane stress (from pressure) where the return holes are located. In addition the overflow box adds strength. In design 2 there is a stress concentration factor at the radius where the front pane extends to the overflow box. If the radius is the same as half the diameter of the return holes it will have the same concentration factor for stress but the difference is that particular area does have much higher bending stress from the long length of the front pane of glass, especially if the tank isn't braced. In addition that corner radius is likely going to be smaller than the hole radius, the smaller the radius the higher the concentration factor meaning higher stress.

As for improved surface skimming, you may be right but 20" is pretty big already. I good alternative if this is what you're looking for is take design 1 and increase the length of the overflow and move the return lines into the overflow like design 2, then you accomplish both your goals.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-03-2012, 12:46 AM
imcosmokramer imcosmokramer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: cleveland
Posts: 296
imcosmokramer is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sphelps View Post
I good alternative if this is what you're looking for is take design 1 and increase the length of the overflow and move the return lines into the overflow like design 2, then you accomplish both your goals.
Do you mean extend them, but not all the way to the ends? I'm going to have a tee and an elbow in there for each of the three drains, so I have to make sure there is enough room.
__________________


LET HE WHO HAS MADE NO MISTAKES CAST THE FIRST LIVE ROCK.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-03-2012, 01:10 AM
e46er e46er is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Maple Ridge
Posts: 819
e46er is on a distinguished road
Default

I like #1
In #2 If your return is under water like that you will need to also figure out a way to stop the syphon when the pump shuts off
__________________
250G DD LED SPS R.I.P.
180G LED SPS
80"x36". 300G custom build

Owner of Mountain Ridge Heating and Gas
Class A gas fitter, HVAC
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.