Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Photography

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-14-2016, 04:18 PM
duncangweller's Avatar
duncangweller duncangweller is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 681
duncangweller is on a distinguished road
Default

That is also true. However if you decided to upgrade to a full frame camera down the road then the ef-s lens will no longer fit and you'll have to buy another lens.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-14-2016, 04:23 PM
xenon's Avatar
xenon xenon is offline
Vendor
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Mississauga, ON
Posts: 912
xenon is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to xenon
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by duncangweller View Post
That is also true. However if you decided to upgrade to a full frame camera down the road then the ef-s lens will no longer fit and you'll have to buy another lens.
YEP!

The #1 reason why I don't buy EF-S lenses.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-14-2016, 04:38 PM
moosehead moosehead is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: vernon
Posts: 74
moosehead is on a distinguished road
Default

Perfect thanks guys, got some options now to look at didn't know we're to start.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-15-2016, 12:02 AM
msjboy msjboy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: burnaby
Posts: 268
msjboy is on a distinguished road
Default another option

One of the members ( see link for his sample shots: https://www.flickr.com/photos/137833...4/23368905422/ ) uses a Olympus TG-4 ( for around $329) underwater cable camera is possibility with it)that is cheaper than a macro lens which starts at $5XX for a macro 60mm new, or around $3XX user, so that might be an option too.

msjboy
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-15-2016, 12:13 AM
moosehead moosehead is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: vernon
Posts: 74
moosehead is on a distinguished road
Default

A nice macro lense would be sweet I won't be buying for a few months anyways and used is fine by me : )
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-15-2016, 12:44 PM
Aquattro's Avatar
Aquattro Aquattro is offline
Just a guy..
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 18,053
Aquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by msjboy View Post
One of the members ( see link for his sample shots: https://www.flickr.com/photos/137833...4/23368905422/ ) uses a Olympus TG-4 ( for around $329) underwater cable camera is possibility with it)that is cheaper than a macro lens which starts at $5XX for a macro 60mm new, or around $3XX user, so that might be an option too.

msjboy
Ya, I just bought one, listed my SLR for sale. I love this little thing Of course nobody wants my 7 yr old Nikon D40, so I'll have to just give it to my kid -lol
__________________
Brad
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-15-2016, 03:10 PM
Reef Pilot's Avatar
Reef Pilot Reef Pilot is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Langley BC
Posts: 1,883
Reef Pilot is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquattro View Post
Ya, I just bought one, listed my SLR for sale. I love this little thing Of course nobody wants my 7 yr old Nikon D40, so I'll have to just give it to my kid -lol
You might want to hang onto your D40, just for outside FTS pics. I have the earlier model TG-2, and while it is great for in tank underwater water shots, I could not for the life of me get a good FTS. Maybe it is just me...

But the problem I had is that the TG-2 (and I think the later models are the same) have no manual focus setting, and I could not get good focus on corals when the pic was taken through the glass.

Also a tip (my apologies if this is old hat to you) is to use the manual white balance setting to get accurate colour (instead of blue dominant). I just pointed the camera to a white sand part in the tank and registered that for a setting. Colours would then come out near perfect. Sometimes still needed to play around a bit with exposure, flash or no flash, but most times pics were pretty easy to get near perfect.

I used this camera for snorkeling in Hawaii (mounted on a selfie stick), too, and worked great with vids, too.
__________________
Reef Pilot's Undersea Oasis: http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/sho...d.php?t=102101
Frags FS: http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/sho...d.php?t=115022
Solutions are easy. The real difficulty lies in discovering the problem.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-15-2016, 03:36 PM
Aquattro's Avatar
Aquattro Aquattro is offline
Just a guy..
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 18,053
Aquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the rough
Default

Walter, I found that I never really use the SLR, too bulky to carry around on holidays, etc.
I'll try a FTS today with the new one, I suspect it's fine. I did a couple shots through the glass as well, they focused fine. Not real sure how that all works.

I fought with the WB using a white plastic sheet, no luck. Pointed at the sand, bingo I like that it has the separate custom WB, I don't have to mess around with it each time. I'm going on vacation in a couple of weeks, so I'll get to try it out on a variety of shots. Currently I use my phone over the SLR. I've had the Nikon 6 or 7 years, I maybe have 500 shutter clicks on it.
__________________
Brad
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.