#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
Quote:
Quote:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/po...find-1.1053624 Interesting article. Just more evidence that genetic change happens quickly. Which I happen to agree with. Some people call that micro evolution and I'm fine with that term. Quote:
Quote:
Here's an interesting article as well: http://www.nature.com/news/dna-has-a...f-life-1.11555 If you read it check out the part by Simon Ho. He is a good example of how evolutionary dogma is clouding his thinking. His reasoning is as follows: There can't be DNA found in dinosaurs or insects trapped in amber as they are at least 65 million years old and we know any bits of DNA code are less than 500,000 yrs old. An unbiased scientist would say something like. Test the dinosaurs and amber trapped insects for dna. If you find it then we know they are less than 500,000 yrs old. If there's no DNA found then there's no issue. I'll read the rest of your links later. Quote:
Evolution = non observable and non repeatable which requires faith to believe exists/works. Hence a belief system. Gravity = observable and repeatable results Particle Physics = observable and repeatable results True science is based on Observable and Repeatable results. Evolution is a hypothetical science that violates known LAWS of the universe. ie 2nd Law of Thermodynamics. Darwinian Macro Evolution is a house of cards just before a wind storm. Get out quick Albert. ;^) Even Richard Dawkins is running. Here's an interesting exchange where he endorses intelligent design and then goes on to say the higher intelligence must have come about via Darwinian Evolution. http://www.c4id.org.uk/index.php?opt...test&Itemid=28
__________________
www.oceanfreshaquarium.com/foz-down.html - Foz Down - an easy way to eliminate algae outbreaks caused by Phosphate and bring back the fun of reef keeping. |