Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 10-16-2009, 09:40 PM
sphelps's Avatar
sphelps sphelps is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lyalta, East of Calgary
Posts: 4,777
sphelps is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.wilson View Post
Okay. I guess 710 gumballs.
Hahahaha, get back to work

speaking of work I should really get back to it as well, this is what my desk currently looks like Cleaned it last week

Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 10-16-2009, 10:13 PM
Parker's Avatar
Parker Parker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,012
Parker is on a distinguished road
Default

Can I be honest?

I believe the thread got a lot of views simply because there may have been a hint of tension.

As for thoughtful discussion on what might be the better option. The decision to use one method over the other is primarily based on personal preference. If you asked most people, what they have in place in their own tanks is the stance they would take. They chose their method of water movement for reasons known only to them. I would be willing to bet most people didn't choose via published stats.. IE: Laminar Flow and watts/gph but rather what they could afford at the time or how they wanted the tank to look.

These are my thoughts only.. I'm probably the dumbest person in this thread!
__________________
Robb
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 10-16-2009, 11:19 PM
golf nut golf nut is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: just north of Toronto
Posts: 454
golf nut is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sphelps View Post
Yes and no, same flow rate different velocity. The lower velocity and greater spread creates an advantage as simulates natural water movement better.


So we agree that if I could make the outlets of a Dart replicate the Tunze/vortech with the dart throttled to be the same as the flow from the vortech/tunze then we would have identical flow?
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 10-16-2009, 11:52 PM
sphelps's Avatar
sphelps sphelps is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lyalta, East of Calgary
Posts: 4,777
sphelps is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr OM View Post
So we agree that if I could make the outlets of a Dart replicate the Tunze/vortech with the dart throttled to be the same as the flow from the vortech/tunze then we would have identical flow?
well not quite. A propeller pushes flow outward so it would take more than simply matching nozzle size, you would need some kind of special adapter on the dart outlet to produce the same results, but if that was the case yes I believe the results would be identical. Other than one uses 15W and the other uses 150W.

Seems strange you want to confirm this so badly, do you have a point you plan on springing on me once I agreed?

Last edited by sphelps; 10-17-2009 at 12:19 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 10-17-2009, 12:12 AM
golf nut golf nut is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: just north of Toronto
Posts: 454
golf nut is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sphelps View Post

Seems strange you want to confirm this so badly, do you have a point you plan on springing on me once I agreed?
Of course.

Last edited by golf nut; 10-17-2009 at 12:26 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.