Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Product Review and Equipment Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-12-2006, 05:21 PM
Coderad's Avatar
Coderad Coderad is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 110
Coderad is on a distinguished road
Question Nano Skimmer

I was looking at Tunze Nano Skimmer. Heard good things, but low levels of oxygen returened to the water.
What do you think?
Is there a better skimmer around that price range.$170
I have a 15gal nano with a 4gal sump. Sump is only 9 3/4" x 9 3/4", would prefer insump skimmer, cause tank is not drill and there is not much room with an overflow box.

Thank Cody
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-12-2006, 06:44 PM
kwirky's Avatar
kwirky kwirky is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,127
kwirky is on a distinguished road
Default

a skimmer would do more harm than good, since the tiny water volume being skimmed would lose it's trace minerals n such at uber speed... 20% weekly water changes will do way more benefit than skimming could ever come close to in a tank that size.
__________________
Everything I put in my tank is fully dependant on me.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-12-2006, 07:22 PM
Kabong's Avatar
Kabong Kabong is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Brentwood Bay B.C.
Posts: 453
Kabong is on a distinguished road
Default

For 10$ more you could get a Aqua C urchin (on sale at J&L this month) rated for 20 to 75Gal.
So when you decide you want a bigger tank you won't have to upgrade again.

Skimming dry would relieve any any worries about losing trace minerals
__________________
______________
Tim
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-12-2006, 08:03 PM
Samw's Avatar
Samw Samw is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Yaletown Vancouver
Posts: 2,651
Samw is on a distinguished road
Default

I prefer the AquaC Urchin. Its not that the Tunze returns water with low oxygen. Its just that it is a closed loop skimmer and the water exchange is done through 2 small holes. So instead of getting 200 gallons per hour going through the skimmer, you're getting about 1 or 2 gallons per day probably. If you don't overstock, then its probably good enough.

Last edited by Samw; 11-12-2006 at 08:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-13-2006, 02:59 AM
anglfish's Avatar
anglfish anglfish is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 56
anglfish is on a distinguished road
Default

Have you checked out the Skimmer from Sapphire Aqautics? It's a guy in Houston that are building them for thee Aquapods and JBJ Nano cubes, but I guess you can use it for any other in sump application.
There is a very informative thread on nano-reef.com.

http://www.nano-reef.com/forums/inde...howtopic=97104

I have mine for 2 days now so it's a bit too early for me to report back any result. So far the skimmate is still pretty wet and has a tea colour. No micro-bubble problems.

anyho.. lemme know if you have questions.
__________________
Angela

Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.