Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Product Review and Equipment Forum > Filtration and Skimmer Specific

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-20-2010, 06:31 PM
snow1's Avatar
snow1 snow1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Surrey, B.C
Posts: 103
snow1 is on a distinguished road
Default

Ya I like those skimmers but alas I don't have $900+ to spend right now. I guess I'll keep what I have until I save up for a better skimmer. Are these are only skimmers that have the pump on the inside or are there other brands as well?
__________________
-29g salt-
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-20-2010, 07:00 PM
Slick Fork's Avatar
Slick Fork Slick Fork is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 631
Slick Fork is on a distinguished road
Default

I'm going to agree with those saying keep what you've got until you can afford a reasonable upgrade. Trading a decent skimmer like yours for a bargain brand which claims a higher capacity but doesn't work as well isn't a really good option.

Do a search over at reef central for the vertex skimmer club, I skimmed a few posts over there discussing replacing the pump and the MASSIVE difference it made in skimmate production. That might work out to be the most cost effective stop-gap measure for you. I can't recall if the In-80's were discussed or not.

Where does the 20" height restriction come from? Your stand? I can't imagine any skimmers rated for that size of a tank that would fit in there. I have an In-180 and I need at least 25" clearance. If it's the way the sump is designed you may have to bite the bullet and buy a new sump to fit a properly sized skimmer.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-20-2010, 08:40 PM
Red Fish Blue Fish's Avatar
Red Fish Blue Fish Red Fish Blue Fish is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Peterborough, Ontario
Posts: 6
Red Fish Blue Fish is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ferret View Post
The bubbleking skimmers are good but not for the mini models. Don't waste money on the mini to handle a system of 200 gal.
Do you have one or seen one in action? I run a mini on 240 gallon fish only and its a beast. Mini = compact for space. water is crystal clear and huge fish. Vertex are great skimmers as well I didnt mention it because of your space req.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-20-2010, 09:07 PM
ferret ferret is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Coquitlam BC
Posts: 142
ferret is on a distinguished road
Default

Yes and I've been running a mini 200 for my 240gal fowlr system too for nearly 2 years but not quite satisfied with the result when compared with my other 140gal fish only system using the swc skimmer I recently bought.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-20-2010, 10:20 PM
Lance's Avatar
Lance Lance is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Powell River, B.C.
Posts: 3,572
Lance is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snow1 View Post
So the space I have to work with here is:
11.5" L
10.75" W
and anthing under 24" in height I can work with.

Problem is I don't think a skimmer for a 200g+ tank exists with that small of a base.
Does anyone have suggestions?

All the skimmers mentioned above are to long or wide...

Check out the Bubble Magus line. Some of them have small footprints.
__________________
225g reef
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-28-2010, 02:01 PM
Skimmerking's Avatar
Skimmerking Skimmerking is offline
acanthastrea freak
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Virden, Manitoba
Posts: 5,687
Skimmerking is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to Skimmerking Send a message via MSN to Skimmerking
Default

yuppers 220 cone will do the Job.
__________________
180 starfire front, LPS, millipora
Doesn't matter how much you have been reading until you take the plunge.
You don't know as much as you think.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-28-2010, 08:29 PM
snow1's Avatar
snow1 snow1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Surrey, B.C
Posts: 103
snow1 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skimmer King View Post
yuppers 220 cone will do the Job.
Thanks but I found my skimmer already.
__________________
-29g salt-
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-18-2011, 05:19 PM
sully08 sully08 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: sherwood park
Posts: 86
sully08 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snow1 View Post
So the space I have to work with here is:
11.5" L
10.75" W
and anthing under 24" in height I can work with.

Problem is I don't think a skimmer for a 200g+ tank exists with that small of a base.
Does anyone have suggestions?

All the skimmers mentioned above are to long or wide...
Check out the Aqua C these are good skimmers with a fairly small footprint, 6"x10" approx.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-18-2011, 06:00 PM
RuGlu6 RuGlu6 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver PoMo
Posts: 829
RuGlu6 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snow1 View Post
Thanks but I found my skimmer already.
What did you end up getting?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-18-2011, 06:01 PM
dsaundry dsaundry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chilliwack
Posts: 943
dsaundry is on a distinguished road
Default

I would normally recommend the BM or the SWC normally, I just bought a SWC 180 and I am wishing I had got the BM now I think. Still having a hell of a time dialing this skimmer in. Sometimes it works great and other times it doesnt, overflows sometimes and other times it puts way too many microbubbles in system. Water levels are controlled by ato and not an issue imo. If I can't lock this down soon I am going to put the old skimmer back in sump.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.