|
|
|
|
|
#1
01-05-2004, 05:18 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I'm only 5ft9 and with my standard 90 gallon being 24inches deep even with 2 inches of sand I still have trouble reaching the bottom of the tank. Jack brings up a good idea, you can find 5 foot 108 gallon tanks for a decent price or a 6 foot 135 for a pretty good price.
Looked at the link for that 30 inch tall tank, it looks amazing, I LOVE.. and I mean LOVE the veiwable refugium under the main tank. That's such a cool idea. I've been thinking about a 120 gallon like Jacks the 4ftx2ftx2ft because I love the front to back dimensions. I find the 90 being 18 inches front to back just limits me to much. I'd like to be able to have more sandy area and swimming area for fish. Doug 
|
|
#3
01-05-2004, 05:31 AM
|
||||
|
||||
 Must be feeling nostalgic...
__________________
-Quinn Man, n. ...His chief occupation is extermination of other animals and his own species, which, however, multiplies with such insistent rapidity as to infest the whole habitable earth, and Canada. - A. Bierce, Devil's Dictionary, 1906
|
|
#4
01-05-2004, 06:01 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
The other night I was back two years in posts... found a good one on Kalk vs calcium reactors. maybe I should just go to bed and sleep... that sounds so, un interesting.
Doug
|
Hybrid Mode
