Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Nano Tank Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-27-2005, 12:28 AM
Beverly's Avatar
Beverly Beverly is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Edmonton
Posts: 3,560
Beverly is on a distinguished road
Default

Looking forward to your pics, Marty
__________________
Beverly
~~~~~

Beverly's 10g Nano YouTube Channel
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-27-2005, 12:39 AM
Richer's Avatar
Richer Richer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Edmonton (Southwest), AB
Posts: 784
Richer is on a distinguished road
Default

I've been debating between sticking with PCs or getting a 70w/150w MH over my 15g fuge... keep us updated on your progress!

-Rich
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-27-2005, 12:50 AM
Ryan's Avatar
Ryan Ryan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Lethbridge, AB
Posts: 1,214
Ryan is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to Ryan
Default

We've got a 70 watt DED and 2 30 watt NO actinics and it does great. I would defiantly spend the money now on a halide because you are going to want one in a year anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-27-2005, 12:52 AM
Richer's Avatar
Richer Richer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Edmonton (Southwest), AB
Posts: 784
Richer is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan
We've got a 70 watt DED and 2 30 watt NO actinics and it does great. I would defiantly spend the money now on a halide because you are going to want one in a year anyway.
Are you referring to me? FYI, I've had these PCs since the beginning of time (though the bulb has changed). My fuge is doing perfectly fine on them... its a matter of whether or not I want to spend the money to make my setup look a little nicer.

-Rich
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-27-2005, 02:15 AM
Beverly's Avatar
Beverly Beverly is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Edmonton
Posts: 3,560
Beverly is on a distinguished road
Default

Rich,

Do you have pics?
__________________
Beverly
~~~~~

Beverly's 10g Nano YouTube Channel
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-27-2005, 02:25 AM
martym's Avatar
martym martym is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Surrey,Bc
Posts: 578
martym is on a distinguished road
Default

Yes, can we see pics to back up that MH is better even in a smaller tank. I had PCs over a 75g and then went with 2x175w MH, didn't notice any difference in my tank. Granted, I only ran the halides for 2-3 months before I had to take the tank down. I've been looking for 70w bulbs but they seem hard to find and the color is yellow even in the higher K's.
__________________
Marty
50g reef, bubble king skimmer,20g sump,zeovit system, PM cal reactor
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-28-2005, 08:56 PM
Fish's Avatar
Fish Fish is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Okotoks, AB
Posts: 724
Fish is on a distinguished road
Default

I have a 70w halide over my 2gal and I don't think it is too much light. That is 35watts/gal but I think there is a point when the watts per gal ratio is irrelevant. For example, if 70 watts mh keeps my frogspawn is healthy under 5 inches of water in a 120gal tank, why would it suddenly need less light just because I put it in a smaller tank?? The thing to remember though is that in a nano, depth has no real affect on light, because the amount of light that hits the BOTTOM of my 2gal is the same amount that would be penetrating only the TOP 8 inches of a 120gal (directly below the bulb). I am not a power crazy par-nazi or anything like that, the only reason I went with mh is because I believe that corals need a threshhold amount of radiation to be healthy. Also, halide is a very compact option for lighting - any other type of bulb/fixture would have ended up being bigger than my whole tank .
Finally, because of its penetrating power, I am able to raise my mh a lot higer above the tank, which helps with temperature control. 70watts of metal halide keeps my tank cooler than the 13watts of pc that it replaced !

- Chad
__________________
Returning to the hobby after an eight year absence.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-29-2005, 11:20 PM
Matt's Avatar
Matt Matt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 661
Matt is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to Matt
Default

I promised to post a photo of my 10g lighted by the coralife 96 quad...

Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-30-2005, 12:26 AM
martym's Avatar
martym martym is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Surrey,Bc
Posts: 578
martym is on a distinguished road
Default

That doesn't look too bright to me. Can't wait to get mine.
__________________
Marty
50g reef, bubble king skimmer,20g sump,zeovit system, PM cal reactor
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-30-2005, 11:49 PM
Ryan's Avatar
Ryan Ryan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Lethbridge, AB
Posts: 1,214
Ryan is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to Ryan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richer
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan
We've got a 70 watt DED and 2 30 watt NO actinics and it does great. I would defiantly spend the money now on a halide because you are going to want one in a year anyway.
Are you referring to me? FYI, I've had these PCs since the beginning of time (though the bulb has changed). My fuge is doing perfectly fine on them... its a matter of whether or not I want to spend the money to make my setup look a little nicer.

-Rich
No I was refering to the ten gallon a friend and I have set up.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.