![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
![]() I guarantee, if you put 3 hours into researching the subject yourself you will be as educated as I am. I have just been following the debate, and had a "holy s***" moment when the ban passed. I didn't that was going to happen, I don't think anyone did. If 10% of the reefing community put 3 hours into researching, and put in 15 minutes twice a week to voice their opinion in a few different places then we would stand a chance! The way it is looking right now is not good. The pro-ban people are not going for a settlement at all, they are not interested in regulating collection. They want a complete ban on keeping fish for any purpose, including captive breeding. This ban also spills over into the freshwater fish of Hawaii. Don't forget that Hawaii is the USA, what goes on there could very easily affect the continental US. Last edited by Myka; 10-16-2011 at 07:49 PM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ugh...
It IS a good thing Myka. Just not for us. For the fish, for the oceans, while you may believe we can be beneficial to these animals in the best of cases scenrio, the fact is, they are better off in the ocean no matter what...as long as the ocean remains able to supprt them. Stop collection and protect these same habitats that collection is banned in and you have yourself the best case sceanrio for the fish... I get why you feel so strongly there is a happy medium but it's only a medium for us and not for the animals themselves. It's hard not to be selfish in a situation like this, but I think no matter which way you look at it the oceans and reefs especially would be better off without our meddling. Habitat/environment protection is key and without it, any ban is senseless but the next largest mitigating factor to the continued survival of any trade related animal is us. Looking at it any other way, IME, is seeing only the side that appeals to u as hobbyists....but I do get where you're coming from. Last edited by gobytron; 10-17-2011 at 03:45 PM. |