Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-09-2011, 03:04 PM
martinmcnally martinmcnally is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 603
martinmcnally is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sphelps View Post
You divide cubic inches by 231 to get gallons not 324. But I agree that might not be the best way to decide on the amount of LEDs, kind of similar to the 5W per gallon deal.

As far as I know you need to be in the range of one LED for each 10-15 square inches. So for example take your tank foot print to be 48"x24", that's 1152sq" meaning you'll want to aim for a range within 76 to 115 LEDs, give or take. No deciding on a final number will depend on your tank height and coral requirements. For something average say 24" tall and mixed reef with SPS you'd probably aim right in the middle of that range.
Correct I wasn't finding the gallons. We came up with the 324 figure based on some test tanks I have here to calculate an approximate recommended 3W LEDs per tank size. That formula would give you 86 LEDs for that tank size you mentioned. You are right though you then use that number and go up or down based on what your light requirements are.
__________________
Western Database - Custom database, software design and cloud hosting.

Last edited by martinmcnally; 09-09-2011 at 03:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-09-2011, 08:51 PM
StirCrazy's Avatar
StirCrazy StirCrazy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 7,872
StirCrazy is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sphelps View Post
You divide cubic inches by 231 to get gallons not 324.
haha thats right ... dislexia is wonderfull, guess I should finnish my coffee before I start reading

Steve
__________________
*everything said above is just my opinion, and may or may not reflect the views of this BBS, its Operators, and its Members. If cornered on any “opinion” I post I will totally deny having ever said this in a Court of Law…Unless I am the right one*

Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive.

Last edited by StirCrazy; 09-09-2011 at 09:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-09-2011, 09:16 PM
ReefOcean ReefOcean is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ridge Meadows
Posts: 199
ReefOcean is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sphelps View Post
You divide cubic inches by 231 to get gallons not 324. But I agree that might not be the best way to decide on the amount of LEDs, kind of similar to the 5W per gallon deal.

As far as I know you need to be in the range of one LED for each 10-15 square inches. So for example take your tank foot print to be 48"x24", that's 1152sq" meaning you'll want to aim for a range within 76 to 115 LEDs, give or take. Now deciding on a final number will depend on your tank height and coral requirements. For something average say 24" tall and mixed reef with SPS you'd probably aim right in the middle of that range.
yes

The degree of optics also impact the coverage significantly.

Also, you can save on LEDs depending on where you place your coral. If you keep all your sps in the middle, you dont need a large density of LEDs at the ends of the tank.

l l l l ll ll llllllll ll ll l l l l l
__________________
Winning
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-09-2011, 02:58 PM
martinmcnally martinmcnally is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 603
martinmcnally is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StirCrazy View Post
um.. thats a handy way to figure out how many gallons your tank is now how many LEDs you need. LEDs are based on coverage only so how many would you need to evenly cover a surface area not a volume.

Steve
I would disagree with that completely. As the guy with the 2 1/2 foot tall tank needs way more LEDs per square inch than a 6 inch deep nano tank.

You calculate what heatsinks you need based on the surface area but LED density is most definitely determined by volume.
__________________
Western Database - Custom database, software design and cloud hosting.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-09-2011, 09:08 PM
StirCrazy's Avatar
StirCrazy StirCrazy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 7,872
StirCrazy is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by martinmcnally View Post
I would disagree with that completely. As the guy with the 2 1/2 foot tall tank needs way more LEDs per square inch than a 6 inch deep nano tank.

You calculate what heatsinks you need based on the surface area but LED density is most definitely determined by volume.

actualy no.. the spacing of your LEDs depends on the lense your going to use on it. so in a very round about way yes the depth of the tank and your PAR requirments at the depth will determin the lense. then the combanation of the lense you use and the hight of the fixture above the surfface to give you even blending of the blue and white will give you the spacing of the LEDs. then the physical surface area will give you how many you need to use at that spacing.

now as for heat sinks, nothing to do with the surface area, but rather with the amount of watts dispersed per square inch. using a 3 watt LED on a star you want a heat sink that will disperce a min of 3watt / sq in I see most are up around the 6watt/sq in, and you can use air movment to increase this value.

if I use your fourmula it tells me I need 20 LEDs for my 30 gal tank, where from mapping my tank and projecting PAR values I know I need 36 to 48 LEDs (calculation was actualy 42) I can get away with 36 but might go 48 as I can get a kit with that number already. so your formula would have probably been find in my tank with no optics and low to med light corals, but not for a pure SPS tank with high light corals at all levels in the tank.

so I guess if it is bassed of one optic choice and now requirement for a specific par level at the bottom of the tank it would work..

Steve
__________________
*everything said above is just my opinion, and may or may not reflect the views of this BBS, its Operators, and its Members. If cornered on any “opinion” I post I will totally deny having ever said this in a Court of Law…Unless I am the right one*

Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-09-2011, 02:10 PM
gobytron gobytron is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 1,424
gobytron is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rice Reef View Post
Quote from Marine Depot
Usage Guidelines
  • One Radion fixture is comparable to one 250w metal halide
  • Generally, one Radion fixture should be used per 40 gallons (150L) of water volume.
  • Approximate surface coverage is 24x24 inches (60x60cm).
Does this refer to water volume in the tank only and if talking about just tank size, for a 90 gallon should I go for three? Really like what I see and seriously considering switching over from MH to LED now.
Unless I'm in JL talking to Rene or John, I just have a hard time taking lfs reccomendations seriously.

Your results may vary.

Last edited by gobytron; 09-09-2011 at 02:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-09-2011, 02:14 PM
Aquaria Aquaria is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 481
Aquaria is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gobytron View Post
Unless I'm in JL talking to Rene or John, I just have a hard time takinf lfs reccomendations seriously.

Your results may vary.
+1 me to lol iv found most LFS will lie to u so as to make more money Rene an John actually give good advice
__________________
Aquaria's SPS nano
http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=69558
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.