![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Harsh?
just pointing out the obvious in my mind. Apologies to those who may feel offended by my words here but maybe it's because they make sense and that doesnt feel too good. In my mind, it's reality thats harsh and not me. Admittably, there is no one I would rather play devils advocate to than tank nazis. Last edited by gobytron; 01-07-2011 at 07:30 PM. |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I gotta agree with you. It's a conflict of interest, in my mind, to defend a fish's rights and freedoms when you in fact own a fish. Is a 180 better than a 90 for a tang? Probably, but marginally at best. Unless you own a tank about a kilometer long, you're not coming close to replicating it's environment. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that unless your gallonage has 4 digits, the tang might as well be in a biocube.
I've heard of tangs settling down once leaving a 4' tank for a 6'. I see no difference in mine after this move. They cannot get anywhere near cruising speed, and you can tell they'd rather be home in the ocean. So while I may admire the intent to do well, believing we are is simply fiction. Reality is, we are a menace to the reefs!
__________________
Brad |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() ![]() Actually, while this statement may sound ridiculous on the surface, I think you're absolutely right and is more or less what the article has found. |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() None of our tanks are suitable in my opinion. Most hobbyists feel better the more space they have. That much we know. We've grown comfortable with the six foot rule which is mostly for our peace of mind not theirs. Six is better than three but it's still a drop in the Big Bucket.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
couldnt agree more theres too much about whats right and whats wrong, we all use the judgement that suits us best if someone elses beliefs or practises are different then our own then thats their god given right but why should we argue over things that will never have a solid answer......whos right and whos wrong is always gonna be up for debate so i say choose your side based on your own feelings. i got into sw for the hobby of it, so as a hobbyst and not a conservationalist i dont quabble over right and wrong i just wait for opportunities to come my way so while you all are arguing ill stand neutral...... this hobby to me is an experiment im not trying to save the world im trying to save my sanity and keep myself busy if i save the reef in the process then great if i am somehow to blame for destroying it then....sorry in advance ![]() ![]() i think the reason we all dont have big fish in super small tanks isnt because we feel morally at fault if that was the case id offer money to every bum i seen we dont do it because they dont fit, if i had a 3' tank and a 9" fish then he takes up the whole tank and would leave little room for viewing which is the whole idea of a aquarium.
__________________
........ |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Tang police, well my opinion is their overall effect may be that the average captive tang's swimming space will be marginally larger when compared to a tang that remains in the ocean. Disclaimer: I have 2 tangs in my tank that is aproximately 130 gallons. If I can afford to, within a year and a half I will upgrade to a 200ish gallon tank. |