Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Product Review and Equipment Forum > Filtration and Skimmer Specific

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-10-2010, 04:04 PM
deputy1234 deputy1234 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: London, Ontaio
Posts: 32
deputy1234 is on a distinguished road
Default

It maybe a little over kill but if you are thinking of upgrading in the future the 160 would work just fine in you're tank. You may not pull the same amount as others but the skimmer will work great. My current setup is 55gallon tank with a 20gallon sump and heavily stocked. My total water volume is approximately 60gallon and the skimmer performs well.

Last edited by deputy1234; 04-10-2010 at 05:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-10-2010, 04:59 PM
freezetyle's Avatar
freezetyle freezetyle is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Victoria
Posts: 802
freezetyle is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by deputy1234 View Post
It maybe a little over kill but if you are thinking of upgrading in the future it the 160 would work just fine in you're tank. You may not pull the same amount as others but the skimmer will work great. My current setup is 55gallon tank with a 20gallon sump and heavily stocked. My total water volume is approximately 60gallon and the skimmer performs well.

thats what i was thinking. i guess i could always run it on a timer to if it really came down to it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-10-2010, 05:04 PM
deputy1234 deputy1234 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: London, Ontaio
Posts: 32
deputy1234 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freezetyle View Post
thats what i was thinking. i guess i could always run it on a timer to if it really came down to it.
I believe you'll be happy with the 160. Its hard to beat the price with what you get with the 160.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-10-2010, 07:19 PM
freezetyle's Avatar
freezetyle freezetyle is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Victoria
Posts: 802
freezetyle is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by deputy1234 View Post
I believe you'll be happy with the 160. Its hard to beat the price with what you get with the 160.
yea, its would also save some cash in the long run. Buy the 120 run it for a year or two. upgrade. sell it for maybe 120-150. spend the extra on the 160 or more depending on what skimmers are out there at the time.

Great review guys. you have started to convert people with the results!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-10-2010, 07:23 PM
H2o2 H2o2 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: winfield b.c.
Posts: 325
H2o2 is on a distinguished road
Default 250-1-a

I am thinking about the 250 1A and was wondering if anybody on here has one as i am torn between it and the alpha cone 170. I see the atman pump is quiet i am wondering if the askoll is quiet because i like quiet and the 170 is quiet but i really want to try the 250 (ie nice build)also do those have a spot for ozone Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-10-2010, 07:38 PM
deputy1234 deputy1234 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: London, Ontaio
Posts: 32
deputy1234 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by H2o2 View Post
I am thinking about the 250 1A and was wondering if anybody on here has one as i am torn between it and the alpha cone 170. I see the atman pump is quiet i am wondering if the askoll is quiet because i like quiet and the 170 is quiet but i really want to try the 250 (ie nice build)also do those have a spot for ozone Thanks
I never owned any of the two but I've researched/read a lot about both. As a matter of fact I was planning on getting the Alpha 170 but opted to buy the SWC 160 ( because it was cheaper and I've read many good reviews on the skimmer). The alpha 170 and SWC 250 1A are both great skimmers and both are extremely quiet. The problem with comparing them both is that the 250 1A is a larger skimmer and can handle a lot more then the alpha 170. It would depend on the size tank you plan on putting them in.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-10-2010, 07:45 PM
H2o2 H2o2 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: winfield b.c.
Posts: 325
H2o2 is on a distinguished road
Default

Thanks for the come back and i think i will have about 220 total gals.but i am a big fan of bigger skimmer cause i may add a fowlr tank to the sump just for a couple i cant have in a reef but have always wanted.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-29-2010, 01:16 PM
Doug's Avatar
Doug Doug is offline
Rest In Peace
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kamloops BC
Posts: 4,920
Doug has disabled reputation
Default

Very pleased with my 160, so far. Skimming very well. Currently in 8in. of water but will be a bit less when in my new SWC sump. Very quiet.

Some pics here in my thread,

http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=64517
__________________
Doug
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.