![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
I always thought that more than 1 pound of live rock per 1 gallon of water simply meant extra filtration, with no real disadvantage other than some loss of space obviously... Does this make any sense?
__________________
Check out my blog: www.nickaquaria.com and my youtube: www.youtube.com/user/nickguay7/videos |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
I found the more rock, the more space for crap to build up. I've been running 1/2lb per gallon (roughly) for the last 6 or 7 years in various tanks, and have much better results than my old 150g that had over 200 pounds of rock in it. When I dismantled that one, it was like a sewer under the rock!
__________________
Brad |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
There was a time way back when it was suggested at 2lb per gal. Now thats old school.
__________________
Doug |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Also, it really isn't how much rock you have in weight. Some rocks can be ridiculously porous and light, which is more important, rather than a giant bolder that weights 3 times as much. |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Wow. Your comparison shot on the 2013 thread shows all that coral growth. Mine never grow like that....
Guess I need t-5,s.... ![]()
__________________
Doug Last edited by Doug; 11-29-2013 at 04:32 PM. |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
That I am my friend... I have 50# of Pukani, so guess its all I will use and a couple flat ones I bought to do my overflow but they skinny. Wanna buy a tub full of Fiji.....
__________________
Doug |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|