|
|
|
||||||||
| Portal | PhotoPost Gallery | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#4
11-02-2013, 08:05 PM
|
||||
|
||||
IMO - it all depends on livestock,bio-load and equipment.
if you don't have a skimmer and or refuge i would say no. if you are able to control NO3 and PO4 with calcium and trace elements then yes you could significantly lower the % of WC. again IMO - WC can correct and keep things in check and not create an issue that takes time and energy to correct. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode
