![]()  | 
	
		
			
  | 
||||||||
| Portal | PhotoPost Gallery | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | 
| View Poll Results: What is your current quarantine routine for new fish? | |||
| Don't quarantine or fw dip | 
		 | 
	    25 | 67.57% | 
| Quarantine 2 weeks no meds unless fish is sick | 
		 | 
	    4 | 10.81% | 
| Quarantine 1 month no meds unless fish is sick | 
		 | 
	    7 | 18.92% | 
| Freshwater dip then 2 weeks quarantine, no meds | 
		 | 
	    0 | 0% | 
| Freshwater dip then 1 month quarantine, no meds | 
		 | 
	    0 | 0% | 
| Quarantine and use copper and/or hyposalinity preventatively | 
		 | 
	    1 | 2.70% | 
| Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll | |||
| 
		 | 
	Thread Tools | Display Modes | 
| 
		 
			 
			#11  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||||
		
		
  | 
|||||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 Bob, I believe O2 goes in by itself quite easily once CO2 is dispelled. The skimmer does an excellent job of agitating the water that flows through it, and I believe this does in fact provide for a higher O2 level than if a skimmer was not used. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
			Good ciculation in a tank with the sufficient surface agitation could provide the same amount of CO2 off-gassing, but this would require a lot of water movement. Ultimately there is a maximum and saying that a skimmed tank will always be higher in O2 is certainly not true. A skimmer will not supersaturate O2 in to solution. It does provide an easy way to remove CO2 though. So, required? No. Helpful in this task? I believe so. Again, so supporting research, but the logic is sound. 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
	
		
		
	
	
	Brad  | 
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		
  |