![]() |
|
Portal | PhotoPost Gallery | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I would do some more research on this method before you do it.
I tried this type of a setup, and it really dosn't work well at all.
__________________
![]() They call it addiction for a reason... |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() What risks are we talking about?
Your critiques are greatly appreciated |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I don't really know exactly. I think there was a thread about doing these and salinity shifts are possible. A shift when you're working with smaller volumes seems likely or no? How will these be done?
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() With brs peristaltic dosing pumps(50 ml/min) on digital timers, they say they're quite accurate....
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Even my profilux dosing motors vary greatly in the amount of drift they have as they get a bit dirty. I'd be so concerned about the setup that continually testing the source water and the tank water to ensure it's always working would be far *more* work than regular changes. I could be worrying about nothing though I do that...
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Continuous water changes are an option with your setup i.e. dozens of small water changes each day to equal 10% change per week.
Try some sort of feedback to detect problems. E.g. float switches hooked to a controller to trigger when too much water is added or not enough removed. |
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() For starters, if one of those timers or pumps die and you don't notice, the result would likely be catastrophic. Especially in a nano.
This approach is ok so long as you are there to observe the process and can intervene if something goes wrong. I certainly would not rely on it to just work automatically 100% of the time. And by Murphy's law, that ONE time that you're not there is when it will fail. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|