![]() |
|
Portal | PhotoPost Gallery | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() i guess you answered it lol so if i were to power them down what the benefit of having them full power say to half power?? or vice versa what would the effect be say to corals what would they lose or gain??
__________________
........ |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Cons: Less lm, so less light for the corals Pros: LEDs run at lower heat so they last longer and they are easier to cool More Power Cons: LEDs run hotter, harder to cool, can reduce the life of the LED if they are running hot for too long Pros: More light for your corals Someone posted a very interesting picture somewhere which I should have saved on dimming his LED fixture when he had just put in the sand into his aquarium. The sand "grabbed" the light and it was interesting to see how dimming effected the intensity. The only way I can explain it is if you had a balloon and you filled it with air and put it inside an empty tank. The area of the balloon was the most intense part of the light (100 intensity). A bit outside the area it fades down to 0. So as you release air out of the balloon you can imagine it getting smaller and the intense part of the light becomes smaller. This is you running them at lower power. Now you add air to the balloon, the intense part of the light gets bigger and it starts getting closer to the sand and hitting the glass. This is you turning up the power. Its not efficient to turn up the power to hit the sand, its more efficient to just add optics to control the light to where you want it to go. im kicking my self for not saving that image. I might have to just grab a tank and throw some sand in it and an LED light over it and dim it to show you what i mean. It was kinda eye opening. |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Maybe I should start a new thread for questions/answers on LEDs for everyone on canreef. Interested?
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() id be for sure do it up
![]() ![]()
__________________
........ |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I just set two of these 100w led spotlights over a 220G 2 months ago, with dimable ballasts.
http://www.ecoxotic.com/catalog/prod.../89/image/393/ http://www.ecoxotic.com/aquarium-led...-pendants.html -easily spreads the tank -12" above the water and may be too bright (testing stage, currently dimmed to 75%) -costs about $250 more then what I would have spend on MH -way less heat transfer -brings out corals colours better then any light I have seen cannot comment on coral growth as of yet with these Nothing wrong with MH, but so far these are proving to be better IMO. |
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Ryan, with spots like that, depending on color, I could see these replacing MH. As long as growth is good long term. Keep us posted.
__________________
Brad |
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Those could be potentially game-changing...
I've read these high-powered canons are not nearly as energy efficient as the lower wattage LEDs but it sounds like 3 or 4 of these 100w versions would light a 400g nicely... So their 50w versions are not dimmable by the looks of things? |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|