L.E.D. vs HALIDE/T5/VHO

[StirCrazy]

Originally Posted by sphelps

Steve, the fact that you measured a 40% drop in par and 32% drop in LUX would suggest the two are directly related. The difference of 8% is minor considering the likely test conditions and equipment used .

A decrease in PAR is simply a result of an overall decrease in intensity which could be measured in LUX. The argument was that LEDs last longer than halides because they don't suffer the CCT shift meaning a more stable PAR reading over time, I suggested this isn't the case.

wohwoh man, I never said they wern't related only not the only factor. the simmple fact is if the big blue spike shifts to the left, PAR will drip off as it shifts compound this with a decrease in intensity and it will be compounded.

you can not gage PAR out put with LUX, two totaly diferant and unrelated measurments. you are in one case measuring the amount of the emitted light with in a specific wave length, in the other you are measuring the amount of visiable light that falls on a given area. kind of a mass vs PSI but of different componants. Like I said in the previous post, no two MH or T5, ect age identicaly. this is due to various factors, including gas concentrations/types inside and so on. LED eliminates this by using a solid state chip encapsulated with no air/gas/ect surounding the chip, but they do have a problem as mentioned... heat. if they are allowed to warm up they will go through a reduction in PPF, which rises again once cooled. this can be as much as a 30% reduction in as little as 1/2 an hour with out any cooling and no drop in intensity. so using a heat sink and fans properly is a twofold benifit.. maintains the PPF output and the life on the LED. I think you would need the fans personaly, other wise the fixtures would be huge inorder to give each LED enough heatsink to make passive cooling possible. by having fans and preperly using them you will be able to produce lighter, more sleak fixtures. for what it is worth I had 4 computer fans running over my sump for 8 years starting and stopping 4 times a day. although they were coated with salt spray they still worked..

Steve

[sphelps]

Originally Posted by StirCrazy

wohwoh man, I never said they wern't related only not the only factor. the simmple fact is if the big blue spike shifts to the left, PAR will drip off as it shifts compound this with a decrease in intensity and it will be compounded.

you can not gage PAR out put with LUX, two totaly diferant and unrelated measurments. you are in one case measuring the amount of the emitted light with in a specific wave length, in the other you are measuring the amount of visiable light that falls on a given area. kind of a mass vs PSI but of different componants. Like I said in the previous post, no two MH or T5, ect age identicaly. this is due to various factors, including gas concentrations/types inside and so on. LED eliminates this by using a solid state chip encapsulated with no air/gas/ect surounding the chip, but they do have a problem as mentioned... heat. if they are allowed to warm up they will go through a reduction in PPF, which rises again once cooled. this can be as much as a 30% reduction in as little as 1/2 an hour with out any cooling and no drop in intensity. so using a heat sink and fans properly is a twofold benifit.. maintains the PPF output and the life on the LED. I think you would need the fans personaly, other wise the fixtures would be huge inorder to give each LED enough heatsink to make passive cooling possible. by having fans and preperly using them you will be able to produce lighter, more sleak fixtures. for what it is worth I had 4 computer fans running over my sump for 8 years starting and stopping 4 times a day. although they were coated with salt spray they still worked..

Steve

Agreed that you can't measure PAR from lux directly, obviously the PAR of a bulb depends on the spectrum distribution. However that was never my point. I'm purely talking about bulb wear and the simple fact is a decrease in PAR over time is the result in an overall decrease in intensity which could be measured by LUX. For example mass and psi are separate measurements but if you have a mass over a given area and the area and gravitation force remains constant then a decrease in PSI means a decrease in mass.

Your "big blue spike" does not shift, or move to the left or right, it simply decreases in intensity and the overall CCT shifts to a lower K rating. Depending on the bulb you can also see an increase in other areas of the spectrum like red and green which is why some bulbs will actually increase in PAR overtime or stay relatively constant. In order for PAR to decrease the overall intensity of the bulb must decrease.

As for fans, they are not needed, there are already plenty of LED lights for other applications which use high powered LEDs with properly designed heat sinks and no fans. It's a simple mater of cutting costs and the temperature gradient and heat transfer rate of LEDs is high and low enough respectively to eliminate the need for convective cooling. Computer components like CPUs run much hotter, their heat flux is way higher than an LED and require convective cooling. Computers are also built as cheap as possible, it's a huge commodity market.

[Ron99]

Originally Posted by sphelps

As for fans, they are not needed, there are already plenty of LED lights for other applications which use high powered LEDs with properly designed heat sinks and no fans. It's a simple mater of cutting costs and the temperature gradient and heat transfer rate of LEDs is high and low enough respectively to eliminate the need for convective cooling. Computer components like CPUs run much hotter, their heat flux is way higher than an LED and require convective cooling. Computers are also built as cheap as possible, it's a huge commodity market.

So you want a fixture that looks stylish, has a long warranty but doesn't run any fans. I'm not sure all those are compatible criteria

[sphelps]

Originally Posted by Ron99

So you want a fixture that looks stylish, has a long warranty but doesn't run any fans. I'm not sure all those are compatible criteria

Well the warranty isn't that big of a thing if the quality is obviously there. But yeah for sure on stylish with no fans, otherwise I'll stick with what actually works, looks good, is reliable and quiet. I call them Halides and like it or not they are the best all around type of lighting for the average tank, just saying

[OceanicCorals-Eugene-]

Originally Posted by sphelps

As for fans, they are not needed, there are already plenty of LED lights for other applications which use high powered LEDs with properly designed heat sinks and no fans. It's a simple mater of cutting costs and the temperature gradient and heat transfer rate of LEDs is high and low enough respectively to eliminate the need for convective cooling. Computer components like CPUs run much hotter, their heat flux is way higher than an LED and require convective cooling. Computers are also built as cheap as possible, it's a huge commodity market.

Im not so sure about that, give me an example of high power LEDs thats out there that doesn't utilize some form of active cooling, the ones found in the new Audi cars utilize passing air from inside the engine bay is a quick one that comes to mind. Its not so much cutting cost, im sure that has something to do with it, But if the heatsinks were made adequate enough for the LEDs to start the addition of fans only adds to the overall benefit of the fixture by keeping the LEDs at a much cooler temperature than without. You keep pointing out that fans have reliability issues. If you rip open one of the fixtures made for our hobby you'll quickly see that the fans they use inside to reduce cost....only costs $1-2. A Prop fan that is made by a good company usually run in the range of $10-12 and are 10x more quite than the cheap ones and push more air as well.

Also i would differ to say that computers are build as cheap as possible, at my previous job i was custom building PCs to fit the need of individual people and if you dont get into the watercooling side of things, the heatsink design + fan is really focused upon in the design of a system. The cooling of a system sometimes allows you to push that much more "juice" out of the system without getting lag. Theres only so much a heatsink can do, in other words you'll never see a top of the line computer system run without some form of active cooling on its components.

[Ron99]

The other thing to consider is weight. Using fans lets you use smaller heatsinks. I have big heatsinks in my unit that probably would have done the job without fans and the bloody fixture weights at least 50 pounds. That is heavy. If I could have found thinner or lighter heatsinks in my price range I would have gone with them.

As you say, LEDs generate less heat than a CPU but you don't have 80 CPUs on one heatsink either. Either way, if you want to run the LEDs with higher current (more output) and keep the size and weight reasonable then fans are likely necessary. if you look at the units without fans they are either using 1 watt LEDs or driving 3 watt LEDs at closer to 1 watt to minimize heat.

[sphelps]

Originally Posted by OceanicCorals-Eugene-

Im not so sure about that, give me an example of high power LEDs thats out there that doesn't utilize some form of active cooling, the ones found in the new Audi cars utilize passing air from inside the engine bay is a quick one that comes to mind. Its not so much cutting cost, im sure that has something to do with it, But if the heatsinks were made adequate enough for the LEDs to start the addition of fans only adds to the overall benefit of the fixture by keeping the LEDs at a much cooler temperature than without. You keep pointing out that fans have reliability issues. If you rip open one of the fixtures made for our hobby you'll quickly see that the fans they use inside to reduce cost....only costs $1-2. A Prop fan that is made by a good company usually run in the range of $10-12 and are 10x more quite than the cheap ones and push more air as well.

Also i would differ to say that computers are build as cheap as possible, at my previous job i was custom building PCs to fit the need of individual people and if you dont get into the watercooling side of things, the heatsink design + fan is really focused upon in the design of a system. The cooling of a system sometimes allows you to push that much more "juice" out of the system without getting lag. Theres only so much a heatsink can do, in other words you'll never see a top of the line computer system run without some form of active cooling on its components.

Ok well these ones you sell come to mind


These 3W crees are enclosed in an aluminum housing which is supposed to keep them cool enough so they don't require fans. It's 3D inductive cooling as appose to just one sided but still a basic design. If fins were added to increase surface area and each unit was mounted to an additional heat sink I would bet the LEDs would run cooler than the fan cooled units currently available and those built by DIY'ers.


Also they make high powered LEDs for various residential applications including pretty much every light bulb standard available, none use fans.


Spotlights
http://www.udmdjstore.co.uk/category...ategoryID=2578
http://www.alibaba.com/product-gs/26...tdoor_LED.html

I could go on but I really do have better things to do these days.

As for computers my point was the CPUs run much hotter and it's commodity market and therefore not really compatible to the LEDs, that's all. I'm not here to debate anything on the subject of computer quality or price.

[StirCrazy]

Originally Posted by sphelps

Also they make high powered LEDs for various residential applications including pretty much every light bulb standard available, none use fans.


Spotlights
http://www.udmdjstore.co.uk/category...ategoryID=2578
http://www.alibaba.com/product-gs/26...tdoor_LED.html

I could go on but I really do have better things to do these days.

.

Ok, you better start doing something else as the two examples here don't show your point at all, the residential ones are 1 watt emitters not 3 watt so way way less heat, and after doing some digging on that block of leds you linked to they use a patent pending cooling system, which happens to be peltier active cooling, which in its self is a cool idea, but not practical for fish tank lights as it would lead to a ton of condensation inside your fixture.

Steve

[Ron99]

Also, have you handled one of those spotlights? They are much heavier than a standard spotlight bulb, So it goes back to weight and size. Scale that up to a full array and you end up with a large heavy heatsink if you want to go without fans.

Like it or not,if you want to run a larger array of 3W LEDs at or near full power without having a 50 pound light fixture you need fans.