![]() |
|
||||||||
| Portal | PhotoPost Gallery | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Try it both ways and if the results are the same then you have proven that it works equally either way... no?
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
I have and the results are equal - I guess elos just wants me to buy more regent from them cause you save alot by doing it the 2.5ml way.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
That's a good idea!
You know that some marketing genius was behind that change. Let's dilute the reagents 50%, give the same volume as before, present it as an "improvement in resolution" and increase the price. Yay for marketing!
__________________
-- Tony My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee! |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
I thought I'd ask Rany-Holmes Farley for his opinion:
Yes, you can adjust volumes in titration kits, but reducing the volume by half increases the uncertainty in the result by a factor of two. That may be a trade off you like, however. You can also go the other way, and make the answer more precise, at the cost of more reagents. __________________ Randy Holmes-Farley Club 65535 Current Tank Info: 120 mixed reef Last edited by Randy Holmes-Farley; Today at 01:36 PM. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
My new test kit had a bottle twice the size of the previous one, not the same size. Maybe I was lucky!!
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|