![]() |
|
Portal | PhotoPost Gallery | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I'm trying to go for the cleanest look in the display area....even with the vortex, you see half a dome stuck on the side of the tank. This is why I'm asking if anyone has done this and how large the actual compartment has to be for the overflow to "keep up" with a stream. Thanks for the comments so far.
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I think RC has an overflow calculator, use it to determine what size overflow you need to cover the flow of the stream + 15%.
Another alternative is drill the tank for closed loop...
__________________
Brad |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() the CL is a good point, one because it looks like you already have to drill a hole for the stream, and 2 you wouldnt have to worry about the space being taken up from the overflow box.
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Not trying to dissuade you from your idea but it just seems rather limiting to me. What about just using a Stream rock perhaps? Same idea that you're hiding the pump but you have the ability to point it in a different direction down the road..
__________________
-- Tony My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee! |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
The other way to do it is to create such a beautiful aquascape and coralscape that no one will ever notice the powerheads. I prefer this myself. Check out some of the TOTM on RC or here and you will realize some have many powerheads in them but you really never notice unless you purposely look. Instead you really just notice all the livestock. Just my thinking on the whole thing... |
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() If you intend on keeping a SPS dominant tank, at some point you will require high-flow powerheads that can be moved. SPS (and any coral for that matter) will eventually grow and obtruct flow, moving a powerhead to keep the flow effective is a good idea.
While somewhat unsightly you get use to them, and realistically most poeple will not even notice them. A closed loop is also a good option, however they generally provide less options to redirect flow as your tank evolves, or as you change the system. I have both a closed loop and 2 Tunze 6100's - each serve a specific purpose and I am happy with each of them.
__________________
I'm out. ![]() |
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Tony, Justin and Dave are all correct. It's amazing how the brain selectively ignores a lot of things when you're looking at a reef tank (or anything else for that matter). Not that my tank is anywhere close to an RC TOTM, but can you guess which Tunze pumps I have in there?
![]() ![]() Answer: There's a 6055 on the left side; a 6100 on the right along with a big honkin' Wavebox - are they very noticeable to you? |
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() fkshiu, I'll give you RC TOTM vote.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I like that idea, personally! I have been thinking of doing the same...an external wavebox! I like this design because you still get the flow only a tunze can provide (Vortechs can't replicate) and there is nothing taking up space in your tank. As long as the box is large enough and has a wave interval, it won't run dry. I don't think you should be concerned about moving your flow if it is properly placed in the first place, if coral growth is impeding flow....time to frag or upgrade the size of your Tunze.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|